[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Avantika Agrawal updated STONEHENGE-88:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: Stonehenge-88-I.patch
This patch overloads some methods in BasicClient so that clients can be created
with urls specified in the database.
This means that we no longer need to store the URLs in the app.config - we can
simply store generic basic/secure bindings.
> Use SEC value to remove unnecessary bindings in .NET
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STONEHENGE-88
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-88
> Project: Stonehenge
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Avantika Agrawal
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Stonehenge-88-I.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to use the SEC value from the database with a single custom
> binding (for all the different stacks), rather than have bindngs for each
> stack individually. This would make the code easier to follow, as well.
> There are several ways we could approach this problem:
> 1 - Have a basic and a sec binding in the App.config files and select between
> the two of these uses the boolean SEC value specified in the SERVICE table.
> This means that the implementations have to use only these bindings - no
> options
> 2 - Implementations can use whatever binding they want as long as its in the
> Config file. This means that the SEC value will be a string and it will be
> used to select between the different bindings. This allows for more than two
> bindings - there can be custom bindings for certain stacks, but this may
> introduce the same complexity that we currently have.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
