Hi there, I have a different idea towards this question. Please correct me if I got wrong. Thanks.
Certificate based StockTrader of M1 means the message level security between BSL and OPS, while the Claims Based StockTrader of M2 focuses on the security between Trader_client and BSL, such as authentication & authorization. So far, as the OPS wsdl is not changed, so introducing CBS won't affect the communication between BSL and OPS. That means, they can be kept in one place, right? Do I miss something? Can someone tell me why we need to separate these two? -- Ming Jin On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Ben Dewey <[email protected]> wrote: > So, I've discussed this with a few people on and off the list, but I'd > like to start a public discussion on the topic. > > We are moving quickly into a Claims Based StockTrader for our M2 release. > There have been significant improvements since M1 and it would be a shame > to lose those. Basically the question is: > > How do we archive the certificate based StockTrader before moving on to a > full Claims Based StockTrader? > > Due to timing I don't think its feasible to have another relase, so we > basically looking at either. > > 1) Tagging a release as M1.1 complete with config and Metro > 2) Branching the StockTrader code for Certificate and Claims Based > > Thoughts anyone? Mentors? > > -Ben Dewey > > -- Ming Jin Consultant Thoughtworks, Incj <http://blogjava.net/mingj> Twitter: https://twitter.com/mingjin
