Looks great. -Ben Dewey
-----Original Message----- From: Nick Hauenstein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: StockTrader Sample Documentation Updates "The User icon (although its already pretty obvious) could have a label like the others." Whoops! That is now fixed. "AFAIK, the User communicates with the TraderClient/Passive STS independently and there is no actually communication between the TraderClient and the Passive STS." This is true. I'm torn on that one. I decided to use different arrows. The browser is technically doing the communication, but the location header that does the redirect and the "action" for the POSTed form are controlled by the Client and Passive STS respectively. As a trade-off I used a different arrows for this communication. As an edit (just updated), I changed the color to make the communicator more clear. - Nick Hauenstein -----Original Message----- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: StockTrader Sample Documentation Updates Regarding the second diagram, Again I think it looks great. The User icon (although its already pretty obvious) could have a label like the others. Also, I'm not sure the little arrows between client/passive STS are descriptive. AFAIK, the User communicates with the TraderClient/Passive STS independently and there is no actually communication between the TraderClient and the Passive STS. I'm not sure if this was the metaphor you were going with, but this may be a stumbling point for users. No need to change this, I'm just curious about others thoughts on this. -Ben Dewey
