Thanks, I have seen whitepapers before. What I was hoping to see was the actual implementation. Apparently, the whitepaper that you are referring me to didn't really help to implement the most important and relevant (at least in my opinion) interoperability in this project.
-----Original Message----- From: Kamaljit Bath [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 11:36 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge For metro-to-wcf interop, you can also refer to this whitepaper http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ff842400.aspx -----Original Message----- From: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge I don't understand your question. This functionality doesn't exist, at least, when I tried and asked questions, I was told that it worked at some point but then code was lost, and now it doesn't exist. Do you want me to send you various email threads on this? -----Original Message----- From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 2:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge What is the problem with the current metro demo? -----Original Message----- From: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 8:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge I have to say that it is disappointing that this interoperability project could not provide a sample of interoperability between JAVA METRO stack and the WCF. This is one of the most important use cases that the industry really needs. Sergei Akopov. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 9:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Stonehenge There has not been a commit to Stonehenge in about 10 months now. The mailing list is pretty much empty except for board report reminders for 4 months. Thus, as mentor, I feel this project is not a sustainable project and should be retired. Are there any objections? Does anyone feel that the above doesn't accurately reflect the situation? Thanks! -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
