|
STOP NATO: �NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
ListBot Sponsor
----------
From: Branka Josilo-Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marbles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Glas
Date: Fri, Jun 1, 2001, 6:58 pm
I hope the translation will make sense. Best Branka
VICTIMS AND CULPRITS
At last, on account of the so called cooperation with the Hague Tribunal even Zoran Djindjic has said something which is partly true: he stated that the financial situation of our country will not improve at all if we agree to cooperate with this tribunal. That means that there will be no large amounts of money coming into the country, a fact which we, even without Djindjic's prophecy, have been maintaining.
Besides this point which is correct, Djindjic added another statement whose validity is, to say the least arguable: he said that the financial situation of our country will markedly deteriorate if we do not "cooperate" with the Hague Tribunal. Without wanting to be harbingers of doom, our theory is that cooperation without question with the tribunal, especially the extradition of Slobodan Milosevic, will put the blame on our country for which future generations will be paying in perpetuity.
During a recent lecture by Robert Miller, a distinguished Australian professor and great conossieur of our situation, Zagorka Golubovic asked why the Americans were so insistent on Slobodan Milosevic's extradition? Prof. Miller immediately replied: a country which is ready to hand over it's head of state admits it's guilt. In other words, instead of clearing the country of collective guilt, as explained to us by various men of the world and other world humanists, the trial of Milosevic at the Hague will confirm our collective guilt and burden us with enourmous amounts of war reparation. If NATO, because of alleged "war crimes" committed by Milosevic, was prepared to, not only, bomb us into poverty, but to kill, why would it not by the same token put the burden of blame and all the costs of its war on us?
There are many indications of how disastrous the handing over of Milosevic would be. It is not coincidental that the US is pushing for proof of Milosevic's responsability for the war not only in Kosovo, but in Croatia and Bosnia. This would not be individual guilt. He would be tried as a head of state which would mean that a guilty verdict would make the country, of which he was head of state, responsible for everything of which he would be accused. Therefore it is not at all accidental that George Robertson, general secretary of NATO, clearly stated that ethnic cleansing, conducted by Milosevic, was conducted by the state of which he was head. After Milosevic's incautious and stupid, and also incorrect statement that "state funds were not stolen, but used to finance the Serbs fighting in Croatian and Bosnia", croat and muslim official have been rubbing their hands in glee. Now they have proof that they were "victims of agression" of the FRY, so that as victims they are entitled to war reparation which they calculate at several tens of millions of dollars.
At the same time the eventual sentence of Milosevic at the Hague, as head of state, would wipe out all our accusations against the NATO pact, while justifying all the means used against us, blackmail, draconian sanctions and criminal bombing. On top of everything, the Americans are trying to achieve, as they did in Vietnam and Nicaragua, by blackmail not only to clear themselves of debts towards the countries which they have made wretched, but also to burden the same with the cost of their "peace keeping" operations in Bosnia and Kosmet, which by the year 2000 had come to more than 21 billion dollars.
This is that careless style of politics, being practiced towards our country, on the basis of Milosevic being handed over to the Hague, which makes the culprits into victims and victims into culprits.
Z�rtve i vinovnici
PIS�E: KOSTA C�AVOS�KI
Konac�no je povodom tzv. saradnje s Has�kim sudom i Zoran ?in?ic� rekao nes�to s�to je bar delimic�no tac�no: izjavio je da se materijalni poloz�aj nas�e zemlje nec�e nimalo poboljs�ati ako prihvatimo saradnju s ovim sudom. A to znac�i da nikakve vec�e pare nec�e stic�i u nas�u zemlju, s�to mi, inac�e, i bez ?in?ic�eve vidovitosti odavno tvrdimo.
Pored ove tac�ne, ?in?ic� je dodao i jednu izjavu c�ija je verodostojnost u najmanju ruku sporna: rekao je da c�e se materijalni poloz�aj nas�e zemlje bitno pogors�ati ako ne budemo "sara?ivali" s Has�kim sudom. Bez namere da budemo proroci zla, nas�a teza je da c�e bespogovorna saradnja s ovim sudom, a naroc�ito izruc�ivanje Slobodna Milos�evic�a, dovesti do prevaljivanja na nas�u zemlju odgovornosti za ratnu s�tetu, koju c�e isplac�ivati i nas�i potomci.
Prilikom nedavnog predavanja Roberta Milera, uglednog australijskog profesora i izvrsnog znalca nas�ih prilika, Zagorka Golubovic� mu je postavila sledec�e pitanje: zas�to Amerikanci toliko uporno zahtevaju da se Slobodan Milos�evic� izruc�i Hagu? Profesor Miler je spremno odgovorio: drz�ava koja pristaje da izruc�i svog bivs�eg s�efa time priznaje da je kriva. Drugim rec�ima, umesto da se su?enjem Slobodanu Milos�evic�u u Hagu skine kolektivna krivica s nas�eg naroda i drz�ave, kako to objas�njavaju tzv. mondijalisti i drugi belosvetski humanisti, takvo su?enje bi samo utvrdilo nas�u kolektivnu krivicu i na sve nas prevalilo odgovornost za isplatu ogromne ratne s�tete. Jer, ako je Atlantski pakt, zbog navodnih zloc�ina Slobodana Milos�evic�a, bio spreman da sve nas, ni krive ni duz�ne, zloc�inac�kim bombardovanjem stras�no ojadi, pa i ubija, zas�to ne bi, po istom receptu, na sve nas prevalio i svoje velike tros�kove ratovanja?
Na moguc�ne pogubne posledice eventualnog izruc�ivanja Slobodana Milos�evic�a ukazuju mnoge okolnosti. Nimalo sluc�ajno, SAD neprestano traz�e da se Milos�evic�eva odgovornost za rat ne samo na Kosmetu, nego i u Hrvatskoj i Bosni, utvr?uje ne kao individualna krivica, nego kao odgovornost s�efa drz�ave, da bi se potom i drz�ava, na c�ijem je c�elu on bio, uc�inila pravno odgovornom za sve ono za s�to c�e on biti okrivljen i osu?en. Nije stoga nimalo sluc�ajno s�to je Dz�ordz� Robertson, generalni sekretar NATO, nedvosmisleno izjavio da je etnic�ko c�is�c�enje, koje je sprovodio Milos�evic�, izvodila sama drz�ava kojom je on upravljao. A posle Milos�evic�eve nesmotrene i glupe, a i netac�ne izjave da "drz�avne pare nisu pokradene, vec� utros�ene za finansiranje borbe Srba u Hrvatskoj i BiH", hrvatski i muslimanski zvanic�nici zadovoljno trljaju ruke. Jer, sada mogu uverljivije tvrditi da su bili "z�rtve agresije" SRJ, te da kao "z�rtve" imaju pravo na naknadu ogromne ratne s�tete koju oni procenjuju na nekoliko desetina milijardi dolara.
Uz to bi eventualna has�ka osuda Milos�evic�a kao s�efa drz�ave uc�inila bespredmetnim sve nas�e optuz�be protiv Atlantskog pakta, a opravdala sve dosadas�nje mere koje su protiv nas preduzete - ucene, surove sankcije i zloc�inac�ko bombardovanje. Povrh svega, Amerikanci nastoje, kao s�to su to vec� uc�inili u sluc�aju Vijetnama i Nikaragve, da ucenom izdejstvuju ne samo brisanje svojih dugova prema zemljama koje su ojadili, nego i da na te zemlje prevale bar deo ogromnih tros�kova svojih "mirovnih" operacija u Bosni i na Kosmetu, koji su do 2000. vec� premas�ili 21 milijardu dolara.
To je ona bezobzirna politika koja se u ovom c�asu, povodom eventualnog izruc�enja Milos�evic�a Has�kom sudu, sprovodi i prema nas�oj zemlji i zahvaljujuc�i kojoj se z�rtve preobrac�aju u vinovnike, a vinovnici u z�rtve.
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
