STOP NATO: �NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
     1.  Fill in the brief application
     2.  Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
     3.  Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This shouldn't surprise us. This was the concept of
"Human Rights" marketed by Eleanor Rooseveldt in her
address to the UN. General Assembly in 1947 and
subsequent pushing of a Human Rights Declaration by
the US. government.

It was of course intended to aid its push to move into
and dominate various parts of the world, and minimise
poular opposition to it.

In particular Operation Rollback, which Eisenhower had
the sense to put on hold, the destabilisation and
take-over of Eastern Europe.

How would this be accomplished? It's here you want to
throw up - by what's called The Original Sin, the
bringing out of various nazi and nazi collaborator
groups, waffen-SS etc. and their organising for such a
task. They would accomplish this by guerrilla warfare
and covert operations , using the methods we were
later to beome familiar with in various other parts of
the world.   

>     Let's see if Mr. Beale is about to run his
> cowardly "both sides are 
> wrong" number about China. Because if he is, we're
> ready.
>     The same demonization and militarization and
> hypocritical "human rights 
> campaign" is being orchestrated about the new
> enemies of the West, the 
> Peoples Republic of China. Mr. Beale is probably
> wringing his clean hands 
> about the suppression of the Fulan Gong mystics
> whose expensive executive 
> offices are located in New York City. He is probably
> getting wild with 
> concern for the 1500 Chinese Human Rights
> "prisoners," while 2,000,000 mostly 
> Black prisoners languish in American jails without
> his or the so-called 
> "humanitarians'" slightest regard. He is probably
> weeping gallons of 
> crocodile tears over the poor (millionaire) old
> Dalai Lama who met with 
> George Bush to discuss how to destabilize and break
> up China. Mr. Beale's 
> myopic views of nationalism probably oppose China's
> historical claims to 
> Taiwan, Tibet and Xinjiang province (rich in oil,
> according to the New York 
> Times, and filled with Moslems Uighurs, a "Muslim
> majority [which) lives 
> restively under Chinese rule, " They "are well
> versed in the NATO bombing of 
> Yugoslavia last year which some celebrate for
> liberating the Muslims in 
> Kosovo." Maybe he is going to start to worry that
> China controls 50% of its 
> state assets, and that could stand in the way of the
> human rights of the 
> Western INVESTORS who want to make ALL of China one
> big sweatshop. Perhaps 
> Mr. Beale will soon see his way to accepting the new
> Star Wars, NMD, which 
> will target China as a dangerous "rogue" power that
> has to be neutralized by 
> the mighty humanitarian American missile defense
> system. Humanitarian bombing 
> can go nuclear! 
>     STOPNATO readers are wise to the manipulations
> of the combined power of 
> the Western Media and our governments, Mr. Beale.
> Why aren't you? Do you 
> really believe the West is genuinely concerned about
> Human Rights in this 
> world?  
>     Oh! The West was madly concerned about the human
> rights of the USSR, as I 
> bet you were. But in the New York Times, last June
> we read that," that in the 
> (former) Soviet Union women have:
>     "Borne the brunt of the changes . . . since the
> fall of communism . . . 
> health care     and child care have collapsed . . .
> Between 1985 and 1997 a 
> UN study found the  transition to a market economy
> meant that the number of 
> working women fell by   40% in Hungary, 21% in
> Russia and 24% to 31% in the 
> Baltic states. . . .  To    make ends meet while
> caring for children. . . 
> some are forced into prostitution." This article
> notes that in the former 
> Yugoslavia pimps scoured, "the war-devastated
> villages, taking girls as young 
> as 14, [to] become prostitutes."
>     How come you don't concern yourself with these
> human rights, Mr. Beale?
> And where was your tender concern when it was
> reported in the Associated 
> Press in October 2000 that at least 50 million
> children in Eastern Europe and 
> the former Soviet Union live in poverty and are
> exposed to tuberculosis 
> levels usually associated with the third world. A
> group called the European 
> Children's Trust found that poverty had increased
> more than TENFOLD since the 
> fall of communism.  This is a massive attack on
> millions of peoples' basic 
> human rights, yet you are so silent about this. How
> come?
> 
>      There you sit, sadly shaking your wise head at
> those of us who mourn the 
> death of Yugoslav socialism wherein 65% of the
> economy was run by the state, 
> no one was homeless or begging, culture and medical
> care and education were 
> basic human rights for all. Until the US began
> tightening the screws, then 
> bombing, and buying a "Democratic" opposition.
> Kindly, dear old Mr. Beale; 
> don't you think that killing off people by bombing,
> deception, corruption and 
> hunger or immiserating them is against human rights?
> 
>     What is it, Mr. Beale, "Just the market
> working?" You have managed to 
> make yourself believe this all happened
> democratically, and naturally? Or 
> maybe you believe your God willed it? 
>     Thank you very much for all your lectures about
> our intemperance, Mr. 
> Beale. We are all much chastened by your clearer
> understanding of human 
> rights.
> 
> 
>
______________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to