STOP NATO: �NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
     1.  Fill in the brief application
     2.  Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
     3.  Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In a message dated 23/06/01 13:10:59 Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

<< ANTI-CAPITAL/ANTI-POVERTY by John Clarke (They Call It Struggle for a 
Reason
 #4, June
 2001, OCAP)
 
 The Ontario Coalition Against Poverty is not a political party. We welcome
 people with a wide
 range of political and religious views if they want to resist the war on the
 poor.  Still, we insist on
 being known as an anti-capitalist organization. When we go up against a
 landlord or welfare
 office, when we challenge unjust governments, we keep it firmly in mind that
 these individuals and
 institutions didn't come from nowhere.  They are the products of a whole
 system that is unjust and
 that creates the poverty and misery we fight back against every day.
 
 Anti-capitalism for OCAP isn't some 'radical' idea to tack onto our work. It
 is for the most
 practical reasons that we take this stand.
 
 1. The Profit System is the Root of the Problem.
 
 Capitalist society is organized around the making of profits. Masses of
 people work for
 corporations who pay them in wages only a portion of the value that they
 create through their
 labour. The rest is pocketed in the form of profits. Not only does this mean
 exploitation in the
 workplace but also that the drive for profits shapes every aspect of
 society. What is produced and
 who can consume it has nothing to do with the real needs of people but oniy
 the enrichment of a
 few. The laws that govern and the way they are enforced are shaped by
 profits. If there's money in
 building condos instead of affordable housing, the homeless will stay on the
 streets, laws will be
 passed to arrest them and the most brutal thugs they can find will be given
 guns and badges to
 'serve and protect' the wealthy.  If it's profitable to clear-cut forests or
 pollute rivers and streams,
 then laws to protect the environment will not get passed or will be weakly
 enforced. In ten
 thousand ways, each and every day, the needs of people are trampled into the
 ground so that
 more profits can be piled up. The vast wealth of the handful of families who
 really control
 everything in this society was built up over generations and was created out
 of our blood and
 sweat and that of those who came before us. Early capitalist society in
 Europe was set up by driv-
 ing poor peasants off their land and passing laws that made it a hanging
 offence to be
 unemployed. The forerunners of today's corporations amassed their wealth
 through the African
 slave trade. They seized other countries as colonies and bled them dry: They
 forced people in
 India to grow opium for export to China and, when the Chinese banned the
 import of this drug, sent warships to bombard their cities until their
 'right' to carry on this profitable business was restored. They stole the
 North American continent from the original Indian population and murdered
 tens of millions of people in the process.  They imported masses of
 immigrants to provide them with cheap labour (as they do to this day) and
 kept these people down by means of the most ugly and brutal racism. They
 fought with their rivals in other countries over who would get the biggest
 share of the
 profits and, whenever they did, working class people were sent off to kill
 their brothers and sisters
 in other countries. Always, they have kept a part of the population
 unemployed and living in
 extreme poverty so as to intimidate those who have jobs and prevent them
 from winning higher
 wages. For generations, they have operated a system that is designed to
 oppress and exploit the
 many in the interests of the few.
 
 2. 'Globalization'.
 
 Despite the power that the capitalists have in their hands, people have
 always resisted them. After
 the Second World War, in the face of huge struggles that threatened their
 system's survival, they
 granted independence to many of their colonies. They also were forced to
 recognize trade unions
 and put in place social programs like medicare, public housing and
 unemployment insurance. By
 the 1970s, however, these reforms were eating into their profits in a big
 way. The rate of return
 on their investments was in decline and this they could not stand for. From
 the mid 705 on,
 capitalism has been working to take back these earlier improvements, An
 agenda that has become
 known as 'globalization' has been developed to remove any and' all barriers
 to the making of
 profits. Central to this strategy have been the infamous 'free trade' deals
 that have led to the
 dismantling of social programs and other protections for working and poor
 people as so many
 barriers to 'international competitiveness'. This brand of globalization
 allows capital to move
 across borders, but not workers. This means that employers have the freedom
 to hunt the globe
 for the cheapest labour, but workers can't counterbalance this trend by
 relocating to improve their
 standard of living.  Mike Harris didn't cut welfare and cancel social
 housing construction just
 because he's a bag of dirt. He did it because the system he represents needs
 to get richer at our
 expense. Under capitalism, even the small gains we've previously enjoyed are
 under the gun.
 
 3. Fight for the Impossible'
 
 The British Tory, Margaret Thatcher, used to tell those who criticized her
 Government's cutbacks
 that 'there is no alternative'. She was right in the sense that there's no
 alternative under this
 system. If we're to fight back against somebody like Mike Harris, we can't
 accept the limits this
 system imposes onus.  If decent paying jobs, living income, adequate
 housing, health care and
 education are 'impossible' under this system, then we have to look beyond
 capitalism. This shapes
 how we fight because our eye is always on what we need and not on what they
 claim is possible.
 This is the most simple but also the most important reason why OCAP is an
 anti-capitalist
 organization.  OCAP's brand of anti-capitalism is based on taking action and
 has nothing to do
 with trying to talk the system to death. At present, we are fighting one of
 its attack dogs - Mike
 Harris - but we fully understand that this fight won't end until working and
 poor people take
 society and its resources into their own hands. Democracy can and must be
 about more than
 voting every four years on which gang of pirates you want to be robbed by.
 It must mean the
 mass of people actually running things and, especially, taking control of
 the production of
 society's wealth. OCAP never begs for crumbs. While we may have to defend
 our crust of bread
 today, we're working for the moment when we take over the bakery.
  >>




______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]






ANTI-CAPITAL/ANTI-POVERTY by John Clarke (They Call It Struggle for a Reason
#4, June
2001, OCAP)

The Ontario Coalition Against Poverty is not a political party. We welcome
people with a wide
range of political and religious views if they want to resist the war on the
poor.  Still, we insist on
being known as an anti-capitalist organization. When we go up against a
landlord or welfare
office, when we challenge unjust governments, we keep it firmly in mind that
these individuals and
institutions didn't come from nowhere.  They are the products of a whole
system that is unjust and
that creates the poverty and misery we fight back against every day.

Anti-capitalism for OCAP isn't some 'radical' idea to tack onto our work. It
is for the most
practical reasons that we take this stand.

1. The Profit System is the Root of the Problem.

Capitalist society is organized around the making of profits. Masses of
people work for
corporations who pay them in wages only a portion of the value that they
create through their
labour. The rest is pocketed in the form of profits. Not only does this mean
exploitation in the
workplace but also that the drive for profits shapes every aspect of
society. What is produced and
who can consume it has nothing to do with the real needs of people but oniy
the enrichment of a
few. The laws that govern and the way they are enforced are shaped by
profits. If there's money in
building condos instead of affordable housing, the homeless will stay on the
streets, laws will be
passed to arrest them and the most brutal thugs they can find will be given
guns and badges to
'serve and protect' the wealthy.  If it's profitable to clear-cut forests or
pollute rivers and streams,
then laws to protect the environment will not get passed or will be weakly
enforced. In ten
thousand ways, each and every day, the needs of people are trampled into the
ground so that
more profits can be piled up. The vast wealth of the handful of families who
really control
everything in this society was built up over generations and was created out
of our blood and
sweat and that of those who came before us. Early capitalist society in
Europe was set up by driv-
ing poor peasants off their land and passing laws that made it a hanging
offence to be
unemployed. The forerunners of today's corporations amassed their wealth
through the African
slave trade. They seized other countries as colonies and bled them dry: They
forced people in
India to grow opium for export to China and, when the Chinese banned the
import of this drug, sent warships to bombard their cities until their
'right' to carry on this profitable business was restored. They stole the
North American continent from the original Indian population and murdered
tens of millions of people in the process.  They imported masses of
immigrants to provide them with cheap labour (as they do to this day) and
kept these people down by means of the most ugly and brutal racism. They
fought with their rivals in other countries over who would get the biggest
share of the
profits and, whenever they did, working class people were sent off to kill
their brothers and sisters
in other countries. Always, they have kept a part of the population
unemployed and living in
extreme poverty so as to intimidate those who have jobs and prevent them
from winning higher
wages. For generations, they have operated a system that is designed to
oppress and exploit the
many in the interests of the few.

2. 'Globalization'.

Despite the power that the capitalists have in their hands, people have
always resisted them. After
the Second World War, in the face of huge struggles that threatened their
system's survival, they
granted independence to many of their colonies. They also were forced to
recognize trade unions
and put in place social programs like medicare, public housing and
unemployment insurance. By
the 1970s, however, these reforms were eating into their profits in a big
way. The rate of return
on their investments was in decline and this they could not stand for. From
the mid 705 on,
capitalism has been working to take back these earlier improvements, An
agenda that has become
known as 'globalization' has been developed to remove any and' all barriers
to the making of
profits. Central to this strategy have been the infamous 'free trade' deals
that have led to the
dismantling of social programs and other protections for working and poor
people as so many
barriers to 'international competitiveness'. This brand of globalization
allows capital to move
across borders, but not workers. This means that employers have the freedom
to hunt the globe
for the cheapest labour, but workers can't counterbalance this trend by
relocating to improve their
standard of living.  Mike Harris didn't cut welfare and cancel social
housing construction just
because he's a bag of dirt. He did it because the system he represents needs
to get richer at our
expense. Under capitalism, even the small gains we've previously enjoyed are
under the gun.

3. Fight for the Impossible'

The British Tory, Margaret Thatcher, used to tell those who criticized her
Government's cutbacks
that 'there is no alternative'. She was right in the sense that there's no
alternative under this
system. If we're to fight back against somebody like Mike Harris, we can't
accept the limits this
system imposes onus.  If decent paying jobs, living income, adequate
housing, health care and
education are 'impossible' under this system, then we have to look beyond
capitalism. This shapes
how we fight because our eye is always on what we need and not on what they
claim is possible.
This is the most simple but also the most important reason why OCAP is an
anti-capitalist
organization.  OCAP's brand of anti-capitalism is based on taking action and
has nothing to do
with trying to talk the system to death. At present, we are fighting one of
its attack dogs - Mike
Harris - but we fully understand that this fight won't end until working and
poor people take
society and its resources into their own hands. Democracy can and must be
about more than
voting every four years on which gang of pirates you want to be robbed by.
It must mean the
mass of people actually running things and, especially, taking control of
the production of
society's wealth. OCAP never begs for crumbs. While we may have to defend
our crust of bread
today, we're working for the moment when we take over the bakery.




Reply via email to