STOP NATO: ¡NO PASARAN! - HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK

--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Have you visited eBayTM lately?  The Worlds Marketplace where you can
buy and sell practically anything keeps getting better.  From
consumer electronics to movies, find it all on eBay.  What are you
waiting for?  Try eBay today.
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/ebay
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear people,

Amidst the insanity of this trial-by-international-piracy (kidnapping with 
full guarantees that "all norms of international law will be respected"!!) it 
is not suprising, I suppose, that the Left should sound a little strange too. 
 

I keep getting emails in which I am told that the kidnapping "contradicted 
the decisions of the President of Yugoslavia."  It did?  What decisions?  I 
will pay $5 (and I am POOR) to any human or beast who can tell me ONE 
decision Kostunica  made (other than the decision to engage in double talk) 
that contradicted this kidnapping. Any takers? Five bucks, guys.

Here is a piece that Richard Hugus, Chris Black and I wrote, refuting the 
"kostunica-is-innocent' stuff.

Best regards,
Jared Israel

The URL for this article is http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/treas.htm
Send this article to a friend!  www.tenc.net  * [Emperor's Clothes]

THE TREASON OF VOJISLAV KOSTUNICA 
By Chris Black, Richard Hugus and Jared Israel [2 July 2001] 

A chorus of voices of remarkable diversity is proclaiming Vojislav Kostunica 
innocent of kidnapping President Slobodan Milosevic. This chorus includes not 
only the mainstream media, which uniformly supports the kidnapping, but also 
various groups and individuals who oppose the kidnapping. Their common view 
is that Kostunica was out of the loop; that the kidnapping was a big surprise 
or even an attack on him by Serbian Prime Minister Djindjic. 

The evidence doesn't support this view. 

KOSTUNICA BLAMES THE VICTIMS 

Yesterday Mr. Kostunica issued a statement on the kidnapping. In it he blamed 
everyone but himself. Remarkably, the blame extended to the Montenegrin 
Socialists (SNP). 

According to Kostunica, by refusing to support his proposed extradition law, 
the SNP had blocked an: 

"opportunity to legally regulate cooperation with the tribunal so that our 
citizens could be protected." {Kostunica's statement, as translated by 
Emperor's Clothes}

Huh? 

Mr. Kostunica's proposed law would have established regulations to speedily 
extradite anyone demanded by NATO's Hague Tribunal. How can that be portrayed 
as "protecting citizens"? When a government regulates Injustice, does that 
make it Just?

In his statement, Kostunica whitewashed Washington and blamed Mr. Milosevic 
for getting kidnapped: 

"From the arsenal of Milosevic's politics, which was truly defeatist for the 
state and the people, are now adopted and revived precisely its most 
undemocratic elements: illegality and the pulling off of humiliating 
maneuvers that no one in the international community asked for, at least not 
explicitly." {Ibid.}

Huh? 

First of all, the "international community" definitely did demand Milosevic 
be brought to The Hague. And they praised the kidnapping once it happened. 
Why does Kostunica deny these publicly known facts? And what is the meaning 
of "at least not explicitly?" 

Second, as far as the kidnapping having roots in Milosevic's practices, what 
practices? Kostunica doesn't say. 

Did Milosevic kidnap people and send them to the Tribunal? No. Did he rule by 
decree? No. If Milosevic was such a terrible dictator, how come he didn't 
even arrest Mr. Kostunica, whose Presidential election campaign last year 
accepted tens of millions of illegal U.S. dollars, smuggled into Serbia in 
'suitcases of cash?' (1)

SHOW PROOF OR BE SILENT

It seems that every time Vojislav Kostunica makes a statement he manages to 
include an attack Slobodan Milosevic, accusing him of various crimes. But 
Kostunica never provides evidence to support his accusations. 

A hundred times Kostunica has said, "Milosevic should be tried at home for 
his crimes." This suggests to the casual listener (that is, most of us) that 
the existence of crimes is a proven fact. 

The opposite is true.

Mr. Milosevic was arrested and held in Belgrade jail for 13 weeks, supposedly 
for purposes of investigation. He was not allowed out on bail because "he 
might try to influence witnesses." During that time no evidence of any kind 
was presented. No witnesses testified against him. Is it a coincidence that 
Milosevic was kidnapped from jail precisely when the legally allowed three 
month investigation period had expired? When prosecutors had to produce 
evidence or release him?

If Vojislav Kostunica possessed facts implicating Milosevic in any crime he 
would have turned that evidence over to prosecutors. Therefore he had no 
evidence. Therefore Kostunica's constant accusations have been lies that 
relied on and reinforced the evidence of rumor and smear spread by the 
Western media and the Yugoslav media controlled by Mr. Djindjic and - Mr. 
Kostunica. 

Kostunica's accusations are frequently quoted in the Western media where they 
help NATO sustain anti-Milosevic (read: anti-Serb) public opinion. Why do 
Serbian patriots tolerate this man? Isn't it obvious that his slanders do 
great harm, particularly now that Slobodan Milosevic (read: the Serbs and all 
loyal Yugoslav people) stands accused at NATO's Hague? 

Which brings us back to the question at hand:

IS KOSTUNICA GUILTY IN THE KIDNAPPING OF MILOSEVIC? 

It is a matter of record that Vojislav Kostunica worked hand in hand with 
Zoran Djindjic to 'deport' Slobodan Milosevic to The Hague. 

Their campaign went into high gear while Kostunica was in Washington visiting 
Powell, Rice and Bush, seven weeks ago. 

Now Kostunica is having a loud falling-out with Djindjic. The function of 
this split is to let Kostunica retain some credibility among ordinary people, 
who loathe Mr. Djindjic. 

Kostunica's claim that he is innocent of the final deed can be disproved 
through the exercise of common sense. 

1) Kostunica used to admit that extradition is unconstitutional: 

"Kostunica has said he would not extradite his ousted predecessor and other 
war crimes suspects to face trial at the international court in The Hague 
because it would be unconstitutional. 

"According to Kostunica, the Yugoslav constitution does not allow extradition 
of Yugoslav citizens to a foreign court." ('AP Worldstream,' January 16, 2001)

2) Yet, after Kostunica met with Powell and Bush in Washington seven weeks 
ago, he promised to push an extradition law through Parliament. He went back 
to Yugoslavia and tried to do just that. 

While he was in Washington Kostunica also discovered new merit in the Hague 
War Crimes Tribunal: 

"Cooperation with The Hague tribunal is something that is necessary for this 
country being a member of the United Nations and behaving as a good member of 
the international community." ('Houston Chronicle,' 10 May 2001) 

That's the Hague Tribunal that has murdered and demonized Serbs. And that's 
the 'international community' that bombed Yugoslavia. 

3) When Kostunica returned to Yugoslavia, he used his control of the mass 
media to try and sell Yugoslavs the notion that they had to bow to the 
Tribunal or Washington would prevent a Donors Conference from 'saving' the 
Yugoslav economy. 

Kostunica had to know these promises to save Yugoslavia were false. Donors 
Conferences may promise some credits, but they are always followed by the 
theft of the industrial wealth of the target country. This is clearly 
explained in the SPS statement, 'We Accuse: Washington's Aid Promises Are A 
Traitorous Lie!' (2)

4) The Montenegrin socialists (SNP) hold the balance of power in the Yugoslav 
Parliament. When they refused to vote for Kostunica's extradition law, 
Kostunica and Djindjic pressured and threatened to force them to comply. At 
the same time, Kostunica suppressed opposition from patriots in his own 
party. 

5) The SNP held firm. So Djindjic and Kostunica decided to bypass Parliament 
entirely.

"The government was forced to issue a federal decree through the cabinet, 
where Mr. Kostunica and his reformists have a majority after losing its 
battle with Parliament this week." ('N. Y. Times,' 24 June 2001)

The cabinet's action not only usurped the functions of Parliament but 
attempted to overrule the Constitution by decree. In his statement yesterday, 
Kostunica still defends this:

"Everything was tried, all was laid out so that - with federal law, or 
federal and republican law, only through republican law, and afterwards 
through the decree of the Federal government - the difficult question of 
cooperation with the Tribunal would be regulated." {From Kostunica's 
Statement}

6) Three days ago, the Constitutional Court ordered a temporary injunction 
against extraditing Milosevic while he appealed the Federal administration's 
decree. 

As President, Mr. Kostunica's job is a) to command the army in order b) to 
protect and defend the Constitution. Which includes, of course, defending the 
decisions of the Constitutional Court. 

Why didn't Kostunica do his job and prevent the kidnapping?

Kostunica says the problem was he didn't know.

That is not an answer. First of all, Kostunica and Djindjic had been partners 
in pushing for extradition all along. Djindjic says he never would have 
staged the kidnapping without Kostunica's approval. 

But even if Djindjic is lying, his intentions were no secret. Days before the 
kidnapping Djindjic and others declared that if legal obstacles were put in 
the way of extraditing Milosevic they would do it anyway.

Once Djindjic made this public commitment to break the law - that is, to 
kidnap the former head of state - it was Kostunica's duty to arrest him for 
conspiracy to commit treason, and order the army to take charge of the 
Belgrade Prison where Milosevic was being held. In this way, Kostunica would 
have guaranteed there was no kidnapping. 

Some people say Kostunica is really a good man, that he failed to take this 
action because he is professorial and absent-minded.

Nonsense. From the start he pursued the extradition of Milosevic with 
firmness and persistence, fully aware it was unconstitutional. 

Two days before the kidnapping, leaders of the Socialist Party (SPS) met with 
him. They said they were worried there would be an attempt to kidnap 
Milosevic before Milosevic's appeal against the Federal government's decree 
could be heard.

Kostunica told those SPS leaders: "I WILL NOT PERMIT DJINDJIC TO TAKE 
UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION." 

So before the kidnapping, Kostunica says, "I won't let them kidnap him." And 
after he lets the kidnapping happen (assuming he was not directly involved in 
the final plan) he says, "I didn't know it was going to happen - but it was 
illegal!" And still he does not arrest Djindjic.

Does he take us for imbeciles?

Mr. Kostunica is the law officer in charge of protecting the Yugoslav 
constitution and defending the State. If a law officer helps lay the basis 
for a crime, if he knows from public information that the crime will take 
place, if he stands aside and lets the crime be committed, then even if - if! 
- he is not involved in working out the final details, he is just as guilty 
as those who have done the dirty work.

Here's the plain truth: Djindjic and Kostunica have sold out their people, 
their own people, to the United States government. 

Djindjic and Kostunica are shameless.

-- Chris Black, Richard Hugus and Jared Israel 

***

Further reading:

1) 'Kostunica Says Some backers 'Unconsciously Work for American Imperial 
Goals'' at http://emperors-clothes.com/news/erlang.htm 

2) 'We Accuse: Washington's Aid Promises Are A Traitorous Lie!' at 
http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/fools.htm 

URGENT APPEAL! 2 JULY

TO THOSE WHO HAVE DONATED TO OUR FUNDRAISING APPEAL - THANK YOU! 

BUT EMPEROR'S CLOTHES STILL URGENTLY NEEDS HELP!

The George Soros Foundation does not fund Emperor's Clothes. Our only source 
of money is people like you. All contributions help. 

Our work has expanded but our income has not kept pace. We are now several 
months behind on long distance and international phone bills, and other 
expenses as well. 

All but local service has been turned off. 

We have other big bills too, including for Lexis, our key research tool, and 
we are presently too strapped for cash to pay for things we need, such as a 
good laptop computer and some graphics software.

We use long distance and overseas calls for interviews (if we need a 
translator, this involves a three-way call) to consult with writers, to check 
the accuracy of information and sometimes to discuss articles being 
translated. We also use international calls to help write and edit articles 
for media besides Emperor's Clothes. 

Using international long distance, we were able to stay in constant touch 
with the unarmed witnesses guarding Mr. Miloshevich's house when it was 
attacked March 28th and 29th. That is why you could read accurate news on 
Emperor's Clothes - the only honest reports available anywhere.

After the attack, by using international phone calls we were able to talk 
directly with people involved in the negotiations between Mr. Miloshevich and 
the current Serbian authorities. So we knew first hand that the 'NY Times' 
report that Mr. Miloshevich was suicidal during the talks was a lie. 

Because we need to use the phone so much, our bills are well over a thousand 
dollars a month. Now our long distance and international service has been 
turned off because we owe almost $5000. We are in danger of losing phone 
service altogether. In addition, we owe over $1500 to Lexis, a key research 
tool, which allows us to check the accuracy of newspaper excerpts and quotes 
over the past 20 years. 

If everyone who cares about Emperor's Clothes chips in, we'll be out of 
trouble in no time.

If everyone chips in - $20, $50, $100 or $1000 - we'll be out of danger in no 
time.

Here's how you can help...

1 - The easiest and most reliable way - Call us any time at (USA) 
617-916-1705 and we will take your credit card information over the phone. 

2 - OR use our secure server at 
http://emperors-clothes.com/howyour.html#donate 

3 - Or mail us a check - to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA 
02461-0321. (USA) 

If you mail a donation or make one by secure server, please let us know by 
email at [EMAIL PROTECTED], just to make sure we get it. Thanks!

Thank you for reading Emperor's Clothes. 

To browse articles from the Website, click here.

www.tenc.net 
[Emperor's Clothes]


______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to