Samba has been around for quite a long time on Solaris, I remember using it back in 1996. It is very commonly used, so much that Sun Cluster has an agent for it.

Dave

Charles Baker wrote:
Hi TK,

I'm adding the sysadmin-discuss to this thread. They may be able to answer your Samba questions.

thanks
Charles


TK wrote:
Hi all,

I am fairly new to Solaris and have been assigned to setup a storagetek 6140. (5 x 500GB SATA drives at the moment)
The 6140 is directly attached to a x4200 via 2 FC HBA's.

My main question is: Once the 6140 is setup what would be the best way to make files on the 6140 attached to the x4200 available to windows clients (mainly xp and 2000 machines/not running Active Directory at this point of time but this could change in the future -12 to 18 months down the line)
I m hearing that samba is not very mature on solaris.
Any insight on the matter?

Also the windows clients mainly access huge satellite imagery (ranging from 300 megs to a few gigs a piece) from the server to process them , what would be the best storage profile for purpose.
Some of the storage profiles that im considering are:

Default High_Capacity_Computing High_Performance_Computing Microsoft_NTFS Microsoft_NTFS_HA Random_1 Sequential Sun_ZFS
Any input on the matter?
I m particularly intrigued by ZFS but not sure if it would be a good fit since i m not well versed in Solaris. Any recommendations? What would be the pros and cons of ZFS in that instance?

Thanks,
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
_______________________________________________
sysadmin-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sysadmin-discuss

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to