A snoop would be helpful.
thanks,
Ken
On Sep 25, 2007, at 8:50 AM, C wrote:
Nigel,
Thanks for the responses. I did see the debugging guide from Dave
before I posted, but it didn't help my issue...But it did help me
understand what's going on better. It's a better document than the
documentation in the Filesystems and Devices Guide on docs.sun.com :)
I did do his suggested command though, and got this...
iscsiadm list discovery-address -v
Discovery Address: 172.24.114.31:3260
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 172.24.114.31:3260, 1
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 172.24.115.31:3260, 1
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 0.0.0.0:3260, 1
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 0.0.0.0:3260, 1
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 0.0.0.0:3260, 1
Target name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:0fb8bf68-bf02-e877-99cd-
ab100852dfdb Target address: 0.0.0.0:3260, 1
The target host is multihomed, so I'm not surprised to see two
entries, one for each NIC, but why the 0.0.0.0 entries?
I did convert to static mode, and that seems to be working fine.
If someone wants a snoop, I'd be happy to convert back (I'm just
playing around at the moment).
I
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
Ken Davis - Manager
Sun Microsystems
New Solaris Storage Group
work: 303.395.4168
cell: 720.837.5818
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
