>> Given the current name convention, does it make more sense to name >> this as scsa2blk? (just to mimic scsa2usb, scsa1394) > > Heh. I noticed that yesterday as well when I was writing the PSARC > 20-questions file. I sort of think the other two are named backwards. > :-) But I guess it is really just a matter of perspective... scsa2sb > and scsa1394 live in the usb and 1394 directories. blk2scsa lives in > the scsi directory.
And anyway there isn't consistency between USB and 1394, otherwise it would be "scsa21394". I named scsa1394 that to be consistent with existing 1394 drivers: hci1394 and raw1394. -Artem _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
