It made sense to me ... maybe we are all suffering from TechonoStress ;-)
CIFS Client Beta 2 works with Nevada builds 64 -> 76 CIFS Client Beta 3 work on Nevada build 77 onwards.. Robert. On Dec 1, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Al Hopper wrote: > > Forwarding to storage-discuss since there seems to be a Sun email > issues with [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT > OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007 > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/ > Graduate from "sugar-coating school"? Sorry - I never attended! :) > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 17:04:43 -0600 (CST) > From: Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Gordon Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [storage-discuss] CIFS client Beta 2 bits and source > available > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Gordon Ross wrote: > >> [ oops - here is Rob's original message ] >> >> We have just posted a new Beta 2 source and package drop for the >> CIFS client project. This code drop offers improved stability >> and correctness. >> >> Please see the download links in the "Code Access" >> section of our project page: >> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/ >> >> Please see the release notes (included in the binary tar file >> and on the download page) for instructions, limitations, etc. >> In particular, please note that the packages provided require >> Solaris Nevada, build 64 or later. They will not run on Solaris 10. >> This build is also incompatible with Nevada build 77 and later >> due to VFS and vnode interface changes in that build; our next >> release will run only on build 77 or higher versions. > > HI Gordon (congrats on yet another code drop!): > > Read the above paragraph again - and see if it makes sense: > > " This build is also incompatible with Nevada build 77 and later" > OK - so it won't run on Nevada build 77 or any later release because > of "VFS > and vnode interface changes in that build". ??? "that build" - you > mean build > 77? And then the next sentance is really confusing: "our next > release will run > only on build 77 or higher versions." > > I'd appreciate a complete re-write - as I can't make sense out of > the above. > You may be suffering from a case of TechnoStress! :) > >> If you have any questions, please feel free to send an email to >> smbfs-discuss at opensolaris dot org. >> >> Thanks, >> Rob Thurlow > > Regards, > > Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT > OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005 to Mar 2007 > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ogb/ogb_2005-2007/ > Graduate from "sugar-coating school"? Sorry - I never attended! :) > _______________________________________________ > storage-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
