Rocky wrote:
>> You most likely have some timestamps that won't fit
>> in 32bits.
>
> Interesting, is that good/bad? Any work-arounds? :)
>
its not good. You shouldn't need full 64bit timestamps until 2039.
I will need to have the CIFS server team investigate what validation is
done on timestamps that are passed to ZFS.
You should be able to use a 64bit ls (/usr/bin/amd64/ls) to list the files.
Assuming it is a timestamp problem you can compile this little program
to fix the affected files.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <utime.h>
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
utime(argv[1], NULL);
}
Just compile it and the pass it the name of a file to fix.
$ ./t <file>
This will reset the timestamps to the current system time.
-Mark
>> What Windows program created those files?
>
> It was some Olympus camera software...
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
