Som,

I don't think anything needs to be done on the target side unless the
target has ALUA capability. It might be helpful to capture a snoop trace
from a host side interface showing initiator login and discovery. That
should answer the question about the page 83 data.

Also, have you modified scsi_vhci.conf at all? If so can you post that
file?

Regards,
Vic


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Somnath kotur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:48 AM
> To: Javen Wu
> Cc: solaris driver; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [storage-discuss] MPxIO support problems on Solaris 10x86
> 
> Javen,
>          Assuming that this is an iscsi target that i have 
> written/rather have full control over it, how can i make sure 
> that my iscsi initiator driver or even the 'iscsiadm' 
> (Solaris's own iscsi initiator) is able to use MPxIO on it? 
> 
>  I have configured the target to have the same name with 2 
> portals, each with different target portal group tags both 
> presenting the same LUN to the OS thereby providing path redundancy 
> 
> I was able to use sendtargets discovery from the 
> 'iscsiadm',get 2 sessions from  both the portals .But found 
> that instead of creating vHCI based pathinfo nodes ,regular  
> ndi_dev info nodes were created for BOTH the LUNS ( If MPxIO 
> worked of course, the paths would be merged and there would 
> be only one entry
> right?)
> 
> I tried adding the 'VID PID' entry in the scsi_vhci.conf  
> with BOTH symmetric/non-symmetric options but it did not WORK 
> ( MDI_NOT_SUPPORTED error returned in mdi_pi_online()) 
> 
> what needs to be done from the target pt of view to indicate 
> MPxIO support?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Som
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Javen Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Som,
> > 
> > If your iscsi target doesn't support ALUA, you need check 
> whether your 
> > iscsi target can match any one of failover operation types solaris 
> > supports. Solaris supports asymmetric/symmetric EMC failover 
> > operation, LSI asymmetric failover operation, sun standard 
> symmetric 
> > failover and sun standard asymmetric failover operation, 5 types 
> > failover operation.
> > Except sun standard symmetric failover types (ALUA), other 
> types match 
> > fops by vendor ID and product ID.
> > If your iscsi target cannot match to any type of failover operation 
> > set, the mdi_pi_online() always fail.
> > So I think you need make sure the type of your iscsi 
> target, then let 
> > we see whether you need add your vendorID and product ID to any 
> > specific fops for matching. If you debug more deeper, you 
> would find 
> > the mdi_pi_online fails at *sfo_device_probe() routine of struct 
> > scsi_failover_ops.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Javen
> > 
> > Somnath kotur wrote:
> > 
> > >Hi Javen,
> > >             Would you be able to help with some
> > MPxIO
> > >support problems i am facing currently with my
> > iSCSI
> > >HBA Driver or guide me to someone /a forum who
> > could?
> > >I find that there has already been an entry with similiar 
> questions 
> > >on the driver-discuss /storage-discuss forum by one 'ram 
> vegesna' and
> > nobody
> > >has replied to it yet?
> > >
> > >Basically mdi_pi_online() is returning MDI_NOT_SUPPORTED 
> .The first 
> > >time i got this error
> > i
> > >realised that i had to add entry of my LUN to the 
> scsi_vhci.conf file 
> > >after which it worked. But
> > since
> > >then (a reboot later) every single attempt at this
> > has
> > >been failing with the same error code,could you pls help?
> > >
> > >Thanks
> > >Som
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> > >Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
> > >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> ______________________________________________________________
> ______________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of 
> Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.  
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
> _______________________________________________
> storage-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
> 
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to