I have 8.12TB (useable) raidz2 pools. 'zpool status' doesn't report space at all (merely error conditions), but 'zpool list' (correctly) reports 8.12T.
Andrew Hettinger http://Prominic.NET || [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 866.339.3169 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.2888 x.110 (int'l) Fax: 866.372.3356 (toll free) -or- +1.217.356.3356 (int'l) Mobile direct: 1.217.621.2540 CompTIA A+, CompTIA Network+, MCP Kenny <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Sent by: [email protected] storage-discuss-b cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] s.org Subject [storage-discuss] ZFS Pools 1+TB 08/27/2008 01:09 PM Has anyone had issues with creating ZFS pools greater than 1 terabyte (TB)? I've created 11 LUNs from a Sun 2540 Disk array (approx 1 TB each). The host system ( SUN Enterprise 5220) reconizes the "disks" as each having 931GB space. So that should be 10+ TB in size total. However when I zpool them together (using raidz) the zpool status reports 9GB instead of 9TB. Does ZFS have problem reporting TB and defaults to GB instead?? Is my pool really TB in size?? I've read in the best practice wiki that splitting them into smaller pools. Any recommendation on this?? I'm desperate in keepingas much space useable as possible. Thanks --Kenny This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: pic10417.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
