> There have been numerous OpenSolaris iSCSI target bug > fixes since build > 77. Whenever you get a chance, it would be > interesting to retry this > experiment with a more recent version of OpenSolaris. > > Peter >
Peter, Please see my first post in the thread... I started on OpenSolaris 2008.05 (svn_86) and recently ran a pkg image-update to bring the server up to svn_99. Still no luck. Unfortunately, our HP-UX systems are a significant reason behind our attempt to migrate from locally attached storage arrays to iSCSI from a/many X4500s. In our test environments we find the need to relocate entire arrays, while preserving the volume groups on them, from system to system. iSCSI and the X4500 would be a perfect replacement... if it worked (on the HP-UX side). I'm not a big HP-UX fan myself, but we do have a good bit of it here. My X4500 goes back to Sun this week, it's an eval unit. > I just loaded an IA64 system with HP-UX specifically > to test iSCSI against our Sun Fire X4500 running > OpenSolaris (svn_99). > > I see the same issue. > > I've had no issues with Linux, Solaris or Windows > initiators connecting to the same server. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
