Hi,
I'm looking for a recommendation for the vdev layout of a storage server that
has 6 1TB SAS drives.  I need 4TB of usable space, which I can get one of 2
ways: 1 raidz2 vdev or 2 raidz1 vdevs.  Reading best practices, blogs and this
list, I understand that having more top-level vdevs is good for IOPS, but I
wonder how that balances against the likelihood of 2 disk failures occurring in
the same vdev in the second case, which would cause total data loss.  The first
case would permit *any* 2 disks to fail, which would reduce the overall risk.

Basically, my question to those more seasoned in the field is whether the extra
vdev will yield enough improvement to make it worthwhile to take on the
increased risk of data loss?

Thanks,
Eric
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to