Peter Memishian writes: > > > > How are the global pieces managed from dladm? > > > > I have generic get/set interfaces exposed from libdladm, and these are > > implemented (inside libdladm) using libscf. I use the same interfaces > > both for dladm and for the actual daemon. > > So [link] is now optional for set-linkprop and reset-linkprop? Also, for > show-linkprop is "--" shown for the LINK field, or something else?
Something else. The properties in question are _not_ associated with links. They're associated with bridges. The ones that are associated with links are stored in linkprop normally, and the [link] for that is certainly not "optional." > (Is > this covered in an ARC case already?) Yep. 2008/055 -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ storage-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
