+1

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Larry Liu"
  To: "storage-discuss"
  Subject: [storage-discuss] Project proposal: multiple disk sector
  size support
  Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:11:04 +0800


  I would like to propose a new OpenSolaris project called multiple
  disk sector size support. This project is to enable Solaris to
  support disks with variable sector size in powers of 2 starting at
  512 bytes and upto 4096 bytes, i.e: 1 KByte, 2KB or 4KB.

  The disk drive industry recognizes the need for a larger sector to
  maintain data integrity as areal density increases in future
  drives. Progressively more error correction code bytes are required
  at these higher areal densities which would increase overhead and
  reduce efficiency if the industry remained 512 byte sectors. A new
  sector standard for magnetic hard disk drives, 4096 bytes, has been
  proposed replacing the previous 512 byte sector length. IDEMA and
  its members including Seagate, Maxtor, Hitachi GST, and Fujitsu
  have advocated for a new industry standard for large-block sectors.
  And the 4096 bytes sector HDD will be released soon.

  This project is going to deliver large sector support into
  OpenSolaris with two phases

  Phase 1
  Support both VTOC and EFI labels;
  Support both raw and block disk IO;
  Support ZFS on non-root disk;
  Support XEN and LDOM on non-root disk

  Phase 2
  Boot support on large sector size disks.
  Installer support on large sector size disks

  I'd like to request endorsement by the Storage Developer community.

  Project leaders:

  Larry Liu
  Nikko He
  Bo Zhou
  Holly Vergara
  Grant Zhang


  _______________________________________________
  storage-discuss mailing list
  [email protected]
  http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com

_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to