A weird issue:
1. avs works for connections on a local switch via local freebsd router 
connected to the switch 
  host1 -> switch -> router freebsd -> switch -> host2 
2.  When trying to emulate replication using far distance remote connection 
with the freebsd router on the remote side then AVS fails with the error: 
[b]sndradm: warning: SNDR: Recovery bitmaps not allocated
[/b]

Full replication nevertheless works in this case, so there are absolutely no 
problems with network I assume. 

I tried to trace start of sndradm with truss, because there is no obvious 
reason for me why it fails. Network ok, name resolution is ok, rpc responds.

What I can see is only the following difference in traces for the sndradm -nE 
command when replication locally and remotely:

getpid()                                = 3245 [3244]          | getpid()       
                            = 3315 [3314]
fcntl(5, F_SETLKW, 0x08046608)        = 0          | fcntl(5, F_SETLKW, 
0x08046608)  (sleeping...)
lseek(5, 0, SEEK_SET)                       = 0           |     Stopped by 
signal #24, SIGTSTP, in fcntl()
read(5, " I G A M", 4)                        = 4           |   Received signal 
#25, SIGCONT, in fcntl() [default]
lseek(5, 0, SEEK_SET)                   = 0             |       siginfo: 
SIGCONT pid=2426 uid=0
read(5, " I G A M\f\0\0\0 f #EF I".., 148)      = 148   |[b] fcntl(5, F_SETLKW, 
0x08046608) [/b] (sleeping...)
read(5, " C : s c m . t h r e a d".., 16384)    = 16384  <
read(5, "   1 2 8   6 4   -     -".., 36)       = 36     <
lseek(5, 2097116, SEEK_CUR)                = 2113684     <
read(5, "   1 2 8   6 4   -     -".., 36)       = 36     <
lseek(5, 2097116, SEEK_CUR)                = 4210836     <
read(5, "01\0\0\01D\0\0\001\0\0\0".., 524288)   = 524288 <


 fcntl(5, F_SETLKW, 0x08046608)  fails? Or is this something else?

Thanks,
Roman
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to