On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Roman
Naumenko<[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Aug 18, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Roman Naumenko <no-
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Using mirrors just makes zfs useless. The whole
>> idea
>> >> is a reliable raid6 storage with snapshots
>> >> features.<br>
>> >> The question is how prevent saturation for one
>> >> volume.</blockquote><div>
>> >> <br>What is your current
>> >> zpool format (raidz, raidz2, etc)? Using a mirror
>> >> does not make zfs useless - you can still use all
>> of
>> >> the built-in features of the software. Mirroring
>> your
>> >> drives just makes it a raid1 instead of raid6.<br>
>> >
>> > raidz2 array of 8 disks, 2Xquade core, 16G
>> >
>> > Yes, it's possible to configure it as 4x2 mirrors
>> with capacity
>> > almost 2 time less, with reliability also degraded.
>> But since they
>> > on the same controller, performance of one pool
>> might be dependent
>> > on access to another.
>>
>> Roman,
>>
>> That config will not handle exchange db well as it
>> will have the max
>> IOPS of a single disk because raidz/raidz2 has to
>> write the whole
>> stripe width in each write.
>>
>> I would seriously re-think your configuration or go
>> with a hardware
>> RAID solution.
>
> I would like to have any major SAN in place for exchange: just put it there 
> and forget, instead of dancing with zfs. Unfortunately, not within the 
> current budget.
>
> But since zfs has more features, better reliability than typical vendor's 
> NAS/SAN appliance and it "free", we are going with it.
>
> Well, performance, yes. I'm personally just waiting for the slog bug to be 
> fixed
> IBM already did a great job bringing 250$ SSD on the market.

I'm not suggesting going out and buying an appliance, just a HW RAID
card with NVRAM cache, create your RAID5/6 config on it then use soft
partitions or export it directly via comstar or iscsitgt and bypassing
ZFS all together, put staying on the Solaris platform.

You can use ZFS separately for applications that are better suited for it.

It's not an all or nothing scenario.

-Ross
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to