On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Dot Yet <dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am trying to setup a small size iscsi based storage. Total 16
> spindles in a system, connected to two Solaris 10 hosts through intel
> gig nics. The disks are configured in a mirror, and locally they
> perform OK. When I try to export them through COMSTAR to those Solaris
> 10 hosts, unfortunately, the performance tanks. I can only get around
> 70 to 80 MB/s. all the nics running iscsi traffic are connected to the
> same unmanaged switch.
>
> I have read about link aggregation. Do you think adding a quad port
> intel NIC and a managed switch can help in getting higher speed over
> iscsi. I also read that having a single connection to the target will
> always use only one of the linked nics, not more than one, so one will
> stay limited to 1 gb throughput only. Right now, I have 4 connections
> per target. do you think link aggregation will spread these 4
> connections over the 4 nics and give me higher throughput. I am not
> looking for exact 4 gb wire speeds, but still something better than 1
> gb.

Link aggregation will give you higher total throughput but individual
transfers will still be limited to the maximum bandwidth of a single
NIC.

Depending on the port selection policy that you define, more than one
client could be using the same NIC. Read dladm(1M) for more details
(create-aggr subcommand).

You are not going to get more than 1Gbps for each transfer though.
Perhaps you should look into 10Gbps NICs if that can't be worked
around.

As a result of multiple NICs being aggregated, you will get better
availability in case one NIC dies. However, the remaining NICs should
be sized accordingly to accept the additional load.


>
> Also, do i really need a managed switch to connect these or can this
> be done through a direct cross cable connection?

I've never used link aggregation with crossover cables but I suppose
it would work if both sides understand how to do it.

A managed switch is your best option in the long run.

-- 
Giovanni
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to