On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Asif Iqbal <vad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Asif Iqbal <vad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a T2000 with 4gb dual port qlogic hba port and a 3510FC array
>> with one controller (upper board) attached to it.
>>
>> I do have mpxio enabled on the host but I only see one path
>>
>> # mpathadm show lu /dev/rdsk/c4t600C0FF0000000000A758B0FE1935B00d0s2
>> Logical Unit:  /dev/rdsk/c4t600C0FF0000000000A758B0FE1935B00d0s2
>>        mpath-support:  libmpscsi_vhci.so
>>        Vendor:  SUN
>>        Product:  StorEdge 3510
>>        Revision:  415F
>>        Name Type:  unknown type
>>        Name:  600c0ff0000000000a758b0fe1935b00
>>        Asymmetric:  no
>>        Current Load Balance:  round-robin
>>        Logical Unit Group ID:  NA
>>        Auto Failback:  on
>>        Auto Probing:  NA
>>
>>        Paths:
>>                Initiator Port Name:  210000e08b892a74
>>                Target Port Name:  216000c0ff8a758b
>>                Override Path:  NA
>>                Path State:  OK
>>                Disabled:  no
>>
>>        Target Ports:
>>                Name:  216000c0ff8a758b
>>                Relative ID:  0
>>
>>
>> I noticed the hba is connected to fc0 and fc1 on the storage
>>
>> but show channels shows channel 1 is not configured with a PID
>>
>> sccli> show channels
>> Ch  Type    Media   Speed   Width  PID / SID
>> --------------------------------------------
>>  0  Host    FC(L)   2G      Serial  40 / N/A
>>  1  Host    FC(L)   2G      Serial  N/A / 42
>>  2  DRV+RCC FC(L)   2G      Serial  14 / 15
>>  3  DRV+RCC FC(L)   2G      Serial  14 / 15
>>  4  Host    FC(L)   2G      Serial  44 / N/A
>>  5  Host    FC(L)   2G      Serial  N/A / 46
>>  6  Host    LAN     N/A     Serial  N/A / N/A
>>
>> And the disks are mapped to channel 0 and channel 4
>>
>> sccli> show lun-maps
>> Ch Tgt LUN   ld/lv   ID-Partition  Assigned  Filter Map
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  0  40   0   ld0     301E8593-00   Primary
>>  0  40   1   ld1     3BDA746C-00   Primary
>>  0  40   2   ld2     160E4F54-00   Primary
>>  0  40   3   ld3     7B083A5D-00   Primary
>>  0  40   4   ld4     7C2AB880-00   Primary
>>  0  40   5   ld5     4F49BC32-00   Primary
>>  0  40   6   ld6     0FE1935B-00   Primary
>>  0  40   7   ld7     5DF994EF-00   Primary
>>  0  40   8   ld8     5F0765C2-00   Primary
>>  0  40   9   ld9     4CF733A6-00   Primary
>>  0  40  10   ld10    6487A542-00   Primary
>>  0  40  11   ld11    266E3F41-00   Primary
>>  4  44   0   ld0     301E8593-00   Primary
>>  4  44   1   ld1     3BDA746C-00   Primary
>>  4  44   2   ld2     160E4F54-00   Primary
>>  4  44   3   ld3     7B083A5D-00   Primary
>>  4  44   4   ld4     7C2AB880-00   Primary
>>  4  44   5   ld5     4F49BC32-00   Primary
>>  4  44   6   ld6     0FE1935B-00   Primary
>>  4  44   7   ld7     5DF994EF-00   Primary
>>  4  44   8   ld8     5F0765C2-00   Primary
>>  4  44   9   ld9     4CF733A6-00   Primary
>>  4  44  10   ld10    6487A542-00   Primary
>>  4  44  11   ld11    266E3F41-00   Primary
>>
>> the target port path of mpathadm show lu above for one disk matches
>> the wwpn for channel 0,  216000C0FF8A758B
>>
>> sccli> show port-wwns
>> Ch  Id   WWPN
>> -------------------------
>>  0  40   216000C0FF8A758B
>>  1  42   226000C0FFAA758B
>>  4  44   256000C0FFCA758B
>>  5  46   266000C0FFEA758B
>>
>> so host (hba) is seeing the luns provisioned through fc0 which mapped
>> to channel 0. but no other path
>
> Also noticed cfgadm shows the second device controller c3 shows connected to 
> ESI
> type instead of disk type like for c2. c3 wwn matches fc1's wwn
> number. so I guess
> if I moved the fiber to fc4 on the 3510's controller board it will
> start showing second path.
>
>
> # cfgadm -al
> Ap_Id                          Type         Receptacle   Occupant     
> Condition
> c0                             scsi-bus     connected    configured   unknown
> c0::dsk/c0t0d0                 CD-ROM       connected    configured   unknown
> c1                             scsi-bus     connected    configured   unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t0d0                 disk         connected    configured   unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t1d0                 disk         connected    configured   unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t2d0                 disk         connected    configured   unknown
> c1::dsk/c1t3d0                 disk         connected    configured   unknown
> c2                             fc-private   connected    configured   unknown
> c2::216000c0ff8a758b           disk         connected    configured   unknown
> c3                             fc-private   connected    configured   unknown
> c3::226000c0ffaa758b           ESI          connected    configured   unknown
> usb0/1                         unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb0/2                         unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb1/1.1                       unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb1/1.2                       unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb1/1.3                       unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb1/1.4                       unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
> usb1/2                         unknown      empty        unconfigured ok
>
>
>>
>> so could I just move the connection from fc1 to fc4 and expect
>> mpathadm to see two paths to the disks ?

I exported the zpool and then move the fc1 to fc4 and then imported
the pool back.
then ran devfsadm -C and now cfgadm show `disk' for the device controller c3 .

also luxadm display shows both path.


>>
>> will it hurt my raidz2 zpools which are already using block devices
>> with those long WWNs.
>>
>> I am running sol 10 u3 with zpool version 15 (patched yesterday to get
>> to this level)
>>
>> --
>> Asif Iqbal
>> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>



-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
storage-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss

Reply via email to