> Note that TPC is *alsays* present in ZODB-driven transactions, even > where only a single connection is uesd, and that virtually every Zope > installation running in the world has at least two stores availalbe (the > "main" one and the "temporary" one); updates which touch both have been > exercising the TPC machnery prety thoroughly.
I intended to say that databases which do not support two-phase commits won't benefit as much from hooking into ZODB's two-phase commitmachinary (as in, the transaction module), rather than saying that ZODB does not support two-phase commit. I can see how I gave room for both understandings. Apologies, and thanks for clarifying that. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
