On 03.09.2007, at 16:54, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> >> what do you think about referenceset caching use-cases? not for the >> first iteration, but i would keep it in mind > > I've just commented on that on the other thread. I'm copying it > here again for the benefit of people following this thread. > > This will be tackled by another improvement, which actually won't > require any changes in the ReferenceSet implementation nor in the > caching mechanism. The Store will be improved to always select > only primary keys, and then select data for missing objects which > are not yet cached. Sum that and the caching implementation we're > planning, we'll get a nice performance boost everywhere, and > ReferenceSets will be happy for free. yes, but this only caches the values retrieved, i thought about caching the resultset somehow. -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
