Hello Mike, Good to see you around again.
> SQLA was meant as a dynamically growing, "release early / release > often" kind of product, and while we are pretty solid for production > right now, this process continues; things will keep changing. Also > the only hard "bug" I've ever heard mentioned is Gustavo's frustration > over transactions, although I'm not aware what the actual "bug" was. There's no point in bringing the "bug" back. Sorry. > One of our developers rewrote and cleaned up the transaction > methodology many months ago and we now support two-phase, SAVEPOINT > and all that other stuff very nicely. I'm happy for you. I honestly hope SQLAlchemy becomes the most successful ORM ever invented. Meanwhile, we'll have to maintain and improve Storm, in its simplicity, so that we can build a few tens of thousands of working code lines on top of it, as we've been doing in the last few years. > So it *was* possible to be fixed ;) Every single software bug in the whole world is fixable, given that the cost for fixing it is paid. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
