Jamu Kakar wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > Jeremy Fishman wrote: >> Hi all, this is more of a curiosity question, but are there any plans to >> implement a backend for Drizzle once they actually release a stable? > > I haven't been following it, so maybe this is obvious, but is there > a reason the MySQL backend won't work with it? >
Drizzle will have a new client library, a totally new wire protocol, has it's own port registered with IANA, and is throwing away a lot of the stupid types that MySQL had. I don't think Drizzle is at the point where working on a Storm backend would make sense - maybe once we have a release and python bindings to the client library, then I'd be delighted to see someone working on a Storm backend. -- Elliot Murphy | https://launchpad.net/~statik/ -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
