On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:07:29PM +1100, Jonathan Lange wrote: > Hello, > > I was just tinkering with some unit tests that deal with some Storm > things, and I started wishing for a way to construct a ResultSet > object without even having to do a query.
I think you can use the EmptyResultSet class . http://twistedmatrix.com/users/radix/storm-api/storm.store.EmptyResultSet.html :) p > > I have a method that returns a ResultSet, but sometimes I want the > result set to contain exactly one object that I know about already. > I'd like to wrap that object in a ResultSet-implementing object so > other parts of the code can call .one() or whatever on it. > > Is this a sane idea? Would it deserve a place in Storm, or should I > just leave it in my (currently) proprietary tree? > > jml > > -- > storm mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
