On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:09 AM, James Henstridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note that there is database specific code for all three currently > supported databases, so it is very unlikely that a new backend could > be done without similar work. > > This also means that a generic "pyodbc" backend is not on the cards: > it would depend on what database is actually being talked to. > > It probably wouldn't be a huge effort to support PostgreSQL or MySQL > through pyodbc, but I'd guess that isn't what Martin is after.
I was hoping that the various database's ODBC drivers would take care of the database-specific stuff, and allow storm to access a common API, as long as I didn't want to do anything too funky (just need simple inserts, selects, updates and deletes, for the most part). martin -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
