On 05/24/2010 09:11 PM, James Henstridge wrote: > My point here is that the enumeration value names are effectively text > rather than encoded binary data. So our Unicode type is probably a > better fit than the RawStr type, and would probably work with current > psycopg2. >
You're right: I just tried using Unicode() with a string ENUM "CREATE TYPE" and it worked just fine on with psycopg2-2.0 and -2.2. I'm not sure what possessed me to use RawStr() previously; maybe I was just trying to avoid the "u" in u'...'. Thanks for your patience. Dan -- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
