So, if I offer patches to use adodbapi for the now-supported database engines (as an option to than the "native" dbapi for each one) would those patches be considered?
The advantages: 1) Microsoft SQL Server databases could also be supported. 2) No need to install/import multiple api packages in order to read multiple db engines. 3) Storm could be ported to Python 3. 4) Storm could be ported to IronPython. The disadvantages: 1) The code for each engine's front end would be a bit more complex (need to try adodbapi if the preferred import fails.) 2) Adodbapi does not work on Linux -- yet. Followup question: If I make adodbapi run on Linux (would require IronPython and Mono) would you be more likely to accept the patches? -- Vernon Cole On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Jamu Kakar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mac, > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Mac Ryan <[email protected]> wrote: > > apologies for making such a basic question, but I looked at the > online > > documentation and could not find any information on this (I am sure it > > must be there somewhere, but...). > > > > I would simply like to know if Storm can be used within programs > using > > the Python 3.x syntax, or if it only works with Python 2.x. > > Right now Storm is only supported with Python 2.x (starting at 2.4). > Python 3.x support isn't really on our roadmap, because there hasn't > been any demand for it (and last I checked the DBAPI drivers were > still being ported). > > Thanks, > J. > > -- > storm mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm >
-- storm mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm
