You are right, @Free. It's not serializable, but it's not 100% safe for
repeatable read (repeatable level can lock only existent row). So, minimal
100% safe level is serializable.

I agree, that best place for nonexistent_cache is application extension,
not library, because it can't be 100% safe for repeatable read.
-- 
storm mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/storm

Reply via email to