On Mon, 10 Dec 2000, Shea Martin wrote:
> Real reason I am writing:
> the commmands ls --human-readable or ls -h do nothing but a simple ls.
> Many of the other options listed in ls produce the same results. Some
> work, and some don't . I don't see any conflicting aliased in .bashrc.
> or .bash_profile What's up?
The alias could be in /etc/profile.
Try "alias ls" and see what that tells you.
If there is an alias, you can remove it with "unalias ls".
Also, note that the only difference with the -h option is that the file
size is expressed differently:
$ ls -l tictactoe
-rw-r-xr-- 1 chris disk 10182 Nov 6 17:36 tictactoe
$ ls -lh tictactoe
-rw-r-xr-- 1 chris disk 9.9k Nov 6 17:36 tictactoe
There will be no difference if you do not also use the -l option. This is
true of some other options as well.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cfaj.freeshell.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/c.f.a.johnson
_______________________________________________
Stormlinux-users-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stormix.com/community/lists/listinfo/stormlinux-users-list
