Dear Richard

 

Without answering your questions at all, I offer the following: is there a good 
reason why biogas is not operated in a pressurised vessel so that it can be 
tapped directly into a container at pressure?

 

Is it simply too expensive to build a pressurised tank with pressure locks to 
get the material in and out?  It is a bit obvious that there would be no 
compression needed it was operated in a sealed steel vessel. The bacteria would 
pressurise it themselves. Do they stop growing under pressure?

 

A digester composed of long PVC tubes would take 9 bars easily. That could 
provide 5 bar tank filling ‘on tap’.

 

Possible?

Crispin

+++++++

 

Not to be facetious about the bag lady in the prior post, but there has to be 
some practical alternative. Biogas is said to be too expensive to compress. The 
comparison was made to LPG for transportation. Like most one line conclusions 
it may or may not be though,  ... In different circumstances. What amount of 
energy per unit atmosphere of compression is expended? Is it a linear increase 
with increasing pressure ? Lets have that plot then talk about practicality of 
transport per various volumetric requirements  of the rest of the 99%, like the 
lady carrying the bag so, perhaps she is not left doing so, so to speak.

I have heard about an intrepid country inventor, Harold somebody, who used his 
refrigerator compressor to generate about 200 psi (12+ atmospheres) off from 
his chicken manure,  to run his car around his town.  What is a practical 
minimum compression for transport and say week long domestic use? Would an 
extended tank -in-tank biogas digestor, properly ballasted and suspended by 
ropes on a basic windlass, generating up to say 15 psi, sufficient to contain 
the required volume in an inner tube? (Where is Boyle when we need him! ) . 
Even the simple wrapping of sealed plastic bags filled with biogas, with 
ubiquitous inner tube tire rubber strips can generate substantial compressive 
forces...  . It all comes down to time and effort versus cost and time of 
alternatives---assuming of course that the so called beneficiary wants it and 
can function as a community member pursuing it. 

Having lived on a tank in well system for four years in Tanzania, am all for a 
practical solution.





Richard Stanley

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to