Frank, Hugh etal 

Few reply comments below. I use "TBM" to mean "torrefied biomass material". 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Shields" <[email protected]> 
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" <[email protected]> 
Cc: "Hugh McLaughlin" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:12:34 PM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Is there a role for combining torrefaction and 
char-making stoves? 




Ron, 



I am not involved in the web site and my work is well beyond what is in it at 
the moment. 

[RWL1: I look forward to seeing updates.] 




I was wrong in thinking the tongue depressor was a measure of heat. Rather a 
measure of percent pyrolyzed (or inverse torrefied) when surface area or weight 
is used. Other measurements are Color change (shades of gray) at low 
temperatures determine temperature, change in pressure to break with 
description of the break determine structure breakdown and , perhaps FTIR when 
I learn more about what it can do. So all the above can be calibrated using 
simple equipment (except FTIR). 


[RWL2: I had always taken the tongue depressor changes to be a potential 
calibrator of max temperature reached (with some time element) - as in your 
sentence #2. 


At the Kyoto meeting (and elsewhere) there was quite a lot on using FTIR for 
this temperature determination purpose. But I still think the use of tongue 
depressors could/might be very helpful in the field - if there is still room 
for dimension changes when the desired temp is around 250-280 oC. You sound 
like the perfect person to give that answer. Maybe Hugh also? 


I have added Dr. David Rutherford (USGS) to this dialog as he has also recently 
obtained an FTIR for this purpose] 




It seems to me that to determine if it is worthwhile to torrefy before making 
char that we need to know which feature change occurs that may make it 
worthwhile. Plot a curve of trucking cost vs. weight of biomass. Or cost of 
energy making pellets vs. torrefication temperatures. Things like that. Then 
making the new partial torrefied biomass we plot the temperature/time needed 
against weight loss for transportation and degree of torrefaction required to 
make pellets at low cost. Then a smart person could overlap the expenses of 
doing all this and see if they overlap showing it worthwhile. Being able to 
control the temperature and time during the process will be a challenge IMO as 
so much happens between 250c and 450c. 

[RWL2: Agreed that we need all this. I am most of the way done in something 
like this - prepared in response to something recent from AD Karve. In talking 
with others, I see that volume changes are perhaps as important as weight 
changes (in case anyone has that data) - if one is trying to minimize 
transportation costs (which I am). 


I don't think that 450 is the right upper limit for the term "torrefaction" - I 
think even 280 oC might be too high an upper limit. Saying this because I think 
we want to keep as much energy gas in the product as possible. Some of the 
first useful gases coming out are not exothermic - and so we don't mind losing 
them. We certainly shouldn't ever mind the big water weight loss. 


One value you haven't mentioned is that torrefaction (always?) means that there 
are chemical/structural changes that change the TBM from hydrophilic to 
hydrophobic. I think this can be a/the key benefit for getting TBM into 
developing country urban charcoal use - to switch from charcoal use to 
TBM-turned-into-Biochar. 








The whole idea of torrefaction is confusing to me. Once wood loses weight after 
moisture it should be ‘torrefied’ up to weight becoming stabilized (~450c). 
where it is now biochar IMO. I’m just learning how to spell the words and 
trying to understand what they mean. That’s harder for me than developing a 
test to determine degree of torrefication. 

[RWL3: Still confusing to me also - but more dialog is helping a lot (thanks). 
But I have to repeat that a temperature of 450 is ready to use as a soil 
amendment. I am OK with that if the gases have been productively used. But I am 
trying to wean urban cooks off of charcoal use - to be replaced by 
charcoal-making. My first economics are saying that the economics can be 
favorable - since the per kilo price of TBM should be appreciably less than the 
price of char (if not transported too far) - and its energy content is getting 
close. Charcoal using stoves are not that efficient - and there is no chance 
for an output as valuable as is Biochar.] 




And any correction of my spelling and meaning of these words is very well 
appreciated. 

[RWL4: Only that I have not seen anything on "inverse" torrefaction; maybe 
better to not try to insert that concept - as the forward direction is hard 
enough to explain? 




Ron 





Regards 

Frank 







Frank Shields 

42 Hangar Way 

Watsonville, CA 95076 

(831) 724-5244 tel 

(831) 724-3188 fax 

[email protected] 

















From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 12:46 PM 
To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves 
Cc: Hugh McLaughlin 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Is there a role for combining torrefaction and 
char-making stoves? 




Frank: (and ccs) 

I'm enjoying this dialog. I see why you are thinking dimensions rather than 
weight - but change in total weight still seems to be a statistic of interest 
to torrefaction researchers.. Your suggestion (last time) for using tongue 
depressors for char-making stove development is very useful. 

I have now (for the first time) wandered around your several test description 
pages. You have an amazingly diverse wet of tests and client-types. On this 
list, I think it OK for you to describe (promote) your business a little more, 
if I initiate the question. 

Nowhere did I see the words "Torrefaction testing". Have you been describing in 
this thread the development of some new (independent lab) test needs for (I now 
see, presumably) many emerging torrefaction companies? 

Any comments on the appropriateness in developing countries of torrefied (and 
maybe pelletized) materials for char-making stoves? Do you think it possible 
that women with such stoves could in some circumstances make rather than expend 
money while cooking? Or better to think that with unprocessed input fuels only 
(I'm thinking transport costs as well). 

Ron 


----- Original Message -----


From: "Frank Shields" < [email protected] > 
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" < [email protected] > 
Cc: "Hugh McLaughlin" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 1:01:47 PM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Is there a role for combining torrefaction and 
char-making stoves? 




Ron, 



<snip> 





I think shape is better as it can fine tune the variation in temperature along 
the TD. Also weights of tars that may collect on the stick will not be an error 
if size is the measure. 



It seems from the links that it will come to a constant size (or weight) if 
given enough time. But for shorter burst of a temperature it will not be 
accurate (as you suggest). I guess it is an average temperature for a given 
time. 



Regards 

Frank 





Frank Shields 

42 Hangar Way 

Watsonville, CA 95076 

(831) 724-5244 tel 

(831) 724-3188 fax 

[email protected] 



















1. I agree that the tongue depressor changes in shape sound like a very useful 
(and cheap at not much more than 1 cent each) diagnostic tool at these low 
temperatures. Especially they seem useful in identifying temperature 
differences at different retort locations. But after that problem is solved, it 
would seem that weight loss (as opposed to dimensions) should be a fairly 
direct indicator of temperature. Have you tried and can report weights for some 
of your temperatures near torrefaction levels? 

2. I have found a fairly robust (and free) technical literature on 
torrefaction. The first two I have read are: 

a. http://www.bioenergytrade.org/downloads/grazkleinschmidtpaper2011.pdf 

Its Table 1 (I couldn't copy, sorry) shows significant (factor of 3?) potential 
benefits for torrefied pellets over charcoal in volumetric energy density 
terms. Also benefits over wood and wood pellets in other measures. Although not 
written for charcoal-making stoves, and specific temperatures are not 
recommended, I take this paper to be positive towards charcoal-making stove 
use. 

b. http://www.dcf.ufla.br/CERNE/artigos/08-01-2010625209%20artigo%20686.pdf 

This one is much more technical - and show results for applied temperatures of 
220, 250, and 280 degrees C. Exothermicity is not seen at 220, but is at 250 
and more at 280. There is a good bit more weight loss at the higher temperature 
- and possibly there is some advantage in terms of pelletizing. But if one can 
avoid pelletizing (by starting with short pellet-shaped branch or chip 
material), It seems like the 250 C temperature could be fine as well - from the 
authors' perspectives. 

Re Frank's tongue depressors, the change in weight (and dimensions) is seen to 
be dependent on time as well as temperature - so simply knowing weight loss is 
not going to provide a unique temperature. Still weight loss is a valuable 
start - and will give some data. If a retort wall temperature reads 250 C and 
there has been little weight loss, one will need to wait longer and/or reach a 
outside higher wall temperature.. 

3. I see lots of other responses (thanks) - going to next. (and so truncate 
this one) So far it lstill ooks like there could be a good application of 
torrefaction to char-making. Hope someone is trying it out. 

Ron 



From: "Frank Shields" < [email protected] > 
To: "Discussion of biomass cooking stoves" < [email protected] >, 
"Paul Olivier" < [email protected] > 
Cc: "Hugh McLaughlin" < [email protected] > 
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:01:54 PM 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Is there a role for combining torrefaction and 
char-making stoves? 

Dear Paul and stovers interest in torrefication or degree of torrefication, 

I have been experimenting with my pipes filled with tongue depressors at 
different temperatures. Still trying to get a way to verify the temperature 
reached the range I want. I use McKesson Medi-Pak Standard 6" (15cm) X 0.69" 
wide. 

http://www.allegromedical.com/browse/browseProducts.do?searchPhrase=tonque+d 
epressors 

These are amazing. They start to shrink at 250c and at 450c are a fraction 
the size they started. Then they still shrink some and start to curl. But 
they keep their shape so measurements (length and width) can be made. If the 
furnace has uneven heat one end will be wider than the other. Best 
temperature gauge within the torrefied range I have found. My plan is to add 
one with each biomass or biochar I am charring. First I need to accurately 
calibrate them. Meaning I need to make sure the ovens are at a constant 
temperature of my chosen. Using these sticks are showing that is not as easy 
as I thought with my old ovens. 

Regards 

Frank 


Frank Shields 
42 Hangar Way 
Watsonville, CA 95076 
(831) 724-5244 tel 
(831) 724-3188 fax 
[email protected] 


-----Original Message----- 
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul S. 
Anderson 
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 6:23 PM 
To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves; Paul Olivier 
Cc: Hugh McLaughlin 
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Is there a role for combining torrefaction and 
char-making stoves? 

Ronal and all, ( I do not know if other Listservs should be sent a copy.) 

Great topic. I have a little different twist to it. 

<snip> 


_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 
_______________________________________________ 
Stoves mailing list 

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address 
[email protected] 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page 
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
 

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: 
http://www.bioenergylists.org/ 

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to