Dear Paul
I think it is not necessary and there are two reasons. First, that energy is not being lost. It is inside the system and sooner or later it comes out in the form of a hot gas, probably preheating the gas before the flame. Second, aluminum would melt in there. If you radiated it at the dome from below the dome would only get a little hotter and you would be cooling the system somewhere else. If the heat was getting away from the stove completely that would matter. Regards Crispin Crispin, You've seen the video of the dome that is red hot. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80REBVTwpMo The dome emits radiant energy in all directions. I placed a shield on the sides of the dome to stop the lateral loss of radiant energy. You can see the shield clearly in the video. But there is a lot of radiant energy (perhaps half) that goes down to burner and does not heat the pot. I want to put a piece of tin foil about 4 mm above the burner. If it does not touch the burner, it should be more reflective. The idea is to reflect radiant energy back up in the direction of the pot. Does this make sense? What difference should this make? Paul On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott <[email protected]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Stoves mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: http://www.bioenergylists.org/
