Dear Martin Boll,

I like your vision of CO2 neutral for households and small scale industries 
with their environment..the equipment has not obligatory to use less wood, but 
to burn cleaner,to give more services (heating, water boiling, cooking, 
drying..), to have a long lifespan, ..If the balance is maintained with local 
environment, it's just perfect. Everyone is winning..

Concerning the equipment design and biomass upgrading is other affair..The law 
of laziness I apply when I fish trout as I know where they will be located in 
the water stream, where they have to make less effort.. but for women in LDC, I 
have too much respect for them to employ such term of laziness as they really 
work hard and all we can do is to help to reduce time to work,hardness of their 
work at affordable cost (most part of population concerned with biomass cooking 
are dealing with 1-2 US$ daily), when it's the case, they are really ready to 
adapt , change habits..

Since 20 years working on technology transfer to LDC context on renewable 
energies, I have no 'a priori', just interrogations concerning interest for the 
users,  we have to test in efficient way new equipment, new way of 
dissemination, ..the reason I'm very interested to see where the Envirofit type 
of stoves are largely disseminated to understand the reasons..(the look, ratio 
cost/durability, the payment facilities, marketing strategy, ..). For the 
moment, I don't know if it's the case..so if someone knows where it's largely 
disseminated??

JF from France





_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to