Dear Mr. Kar,   and to other Stovers.

Mr. Kar asked me a question, and I am sending the response to the larger audience of the Stoves Listserv and for posting onto my www.drtlud.com website.
while Jetter et al., 2012 (attached) classifies both HD4012 (Philips forced draft) and Oorja as "variations of gasifier stove", some experts (Mukunda et al., 2011) are of the opinion that HD4012 is an in-situ combustion design while Oorja is a gasifier stove.

About your question, I basically agree with Dr. Mukunda, to whom I also send my warmest regards. The term "in-situ" correctly distinguishes the combustion from that of the TLUD gasifiers that have the migratory pyrolysis front. They can all be gasifiers (depending on the definition of gasifier), but they are not in the same categories.

There is a stove type that I call "fan-jet" stoves because high turbulence of limited air is the key feature. And they are not really top-lit. Those stoves are: Philips forced air, WorldStove Lucia forced air, Ecococina of El Salvador, and the new BioLite stoves (all have forced air, but Philips and WorldStove also have natural draft units that are sometimes confused if we do not emphasize the forced air versions.) The developers of each of those four stoves have patent claims and are for-profit companies. They are quite distinct from the TLUD stoves with fans or without.

If others want to propose a different name instead of "fan-jet", that is fine. But do not call them "fan stoves" because there are simply too many ways to have forced air. So many different stoves with fans should not be lumped together.

The high turbulence is the way the fan-jet stoves get clean emissions, but they do NOT function (at least not very well) as a TLUD stove with the pyrolysis front moving downward in a stationary fuel pile. Fan-jet stoves have their fire (hot spot) down near the bottom, even from the beginning. That is why they can accept new amounts of fuel onto the top of the hot spot.

Note that the Oorja stove is commonly ignited as a TLUD, but once the pyrolysis front reaches the bottom, the forced air allows people to add in small amounts of fuel (I call that "trickle fueling"). But it is NOT operating any longer as a TLUD combustion device. It would be a bottom-burning stove with well controlled air. And the bottom burning is of hot charcoal, so the bottom of the stove is endangered. That is why the Oorja stoves have a cast iron cup, to prevent destruction of the lower part of the stove. The Tom Reed WoodGas Campstove is similar, but without the cup.

The above comments will be clear to those who have seen these various stoves in operation. And there does need to be a clear distinction between the various types of stoves.

[To Mr. Kar:
It is a pleasure to meet you via email. At what TERI facility are you located? I am a friend of Dr. Srinivas who was in southern India (Bangalore ??) with TERI, but is now in Delhi. ]

Paul    /    Dr TLUD

Paul S. Anderson, PhD  aka "Dr TLUD"
Email:  [email protected]   Skype: paultlud  Phone: +1-309-452-7072
Website:  www.drtlud.com

On 10/30/2012 8:42 AM, abhishek kar wrote:
Dear Dr. Anderson,
I am an Associate Fellow with The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI www.teriin.org <http://www.teriin.org> ), India. I have been working on various technical and dissemination aspects of improved cook-stoves in India and Kenya with focus on black carbon and market value chain. I have recently published a paper on the linkage between black carbon and cookstoves (attached-Kar et al., 2012). I was also the site manager of a field research project related to black carbon mitigation- Project Surya www.projectsurya.org <http://www.projectsurya.org>

As the world's foremost authority on gasifiers for cooking applications, can you share your approach for classification of stoves as there seems to be grey areas in the classification.

For example, while Jetters et al., 2012 (attached) classifies both HD4012 (Philips forced draft) and Oorja as "variations of gasifier stove", some experts (Mukunda et al., 2011) are of the opinion that HD4012 is an in-situ combustion design while Oorja is a gasifier stove.

Based on my limited understanding of micro-gasification, I wonder if original design intent is more relevant or style of operations that drives the classification approach. How do we distinguish between HD4012 and Oorja if both stoves have batch fuel loading and top lit operations using same fuel type? I keenly look forward towards your expert views in this regard.

Warm Regards,
Abhishek Kar




_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to