Dear Ron

 

1)    I would guess that adding an insulating layer on the outside of the 
convective skirt would be cost effective.  Have you (or anyone) seen this tried?



I have accidentally tried it using a ceramic pipe as a skirt and sinking the 
pot into it! Not really a deliberate as much as an exploratory work. The gain 
is that the skirt is already an insulator. The losses from the aside are less 
than the losses of the unconstrained gases into the air near the pot.

I have seen pot cosies and insulated lid cosies. Because a lot of heat is lost 
from the top of a lit an insulated layer on top of a lid retains a lot of heat 
and cheaply too.

 2)  You mentioned two tests at Alex' location, but only described the home 
self-feeding stove.  I presume the other was the char-producing moving grate 
greenhouse boiler.  Your measurements/thoughts on that system (if you saw it)?  
 I ask because I hope others will start replicating this one.



The other working system was a wood chip version of the pellet stove. It has a 
motor powering a foot that rises and lowers in order to tamp fuel into a 
combustion chamber. If the fuel builds up, it stops turning until the fuel has 
burned down. It does not produce char and it has no moving grate. I was a 
higher power device and operated with a straight pipe extending horizontally 
from the combustion chamber.  The CO/CO2 was frequently zero as there was no 
detectable CO for periods of time. I found the excess air to be 200% but Alex 
adjusted it to about 80% and the CO disappeared. The system efficiency was very 
high even though the heat exchanger was not all that complex. I don’t remember 
what the number was but it is on the memory of the analyser so  I will download 
then sometime.

The unit that has a moving grate is enormous. It can easily produce char simply 
by running the grate at a speed that does not let all the char burn and it 
falls off the end. He can make as much as he wants by turning a knob. It is not 
a trifling system, however. It has operated by a programmable logic controller 
and cost hundreds of thousands of $. It does burn a very cheap fuel (about 500 
tons of it was on site) and it has a marvellous electro-mechanical fuel feeding 
system that is very effective. It consists of a travelling auger and a four 
stage conveyor-hopper system that ultimately places the fuel into the burner 
without letting in much air. This is does by using a sort of paddle wheel like 
you would see on a simple centrifugal fan. It fits the space closely and lowers 
batches of chips into the hopper attached to the furnace. If the fire gets into 
the hopper a water pipe sprays the fuel automatically.

One surprising thing about the system is that there is a very small difference 
between the input and outlet temperature. It is a hot water system that 
operates at a high flow rate and the entire system is about the same 
temperature all the time.

In terms of char production, as the % of char produced can be changed at will 
just be changing the grate speed, the formation temperature can also be 
adjusted by the same method. As the lower temperature char seems not to work 
all that well perhaps the lower yielding high temperature char will have a 
practical use all the time.

Regards

Crispin

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to