Dear Christina

 

I intend to reply to your message because there are several points which really 
should be expanded upon. I will invite Cecil Cook (stove anthropologist) to 
contribute as well. We are a bit overloaded at the moment but the point is 
taken: we need the social acceptability test methods reviewed, the test 
conducted (to see that it is relevant to the social circumstances) and the 
processing steps to see that the calculated result (the rating) is what we 
intend it to be.

 

There are many people involved in the application of test results to policy and 
where there is not much agreement on what should be measured, there is even 
less on how reviews of the evaluations should be conducted.

 

What I am saying is that there are several conversations that should be taking 
place. The first is the one where we establish what is conceptually a valid, 
typical task in the target market. The second is the selection of appropriate 
metrics relevant to that task. The third is the design of an experiment (or set 
of experiments for different stove types) that provides the measured values, be 
they performance, durability or safety. The fourth is to describe method to 
processing those measured quantities into relevant and valid outputs that 
reliably inform policy makers. The fifth is the review by others skilled in the 
art to check that the whole process is scientifically and socially valid.

 

I felt that you raised the fifth. That is fine, but we need to have the first 
discussion before we take too much time checking to see if 8 was correctly 
added to 5. Maybe it should have been 6 and 10 that we were should be concerned 
about.

 

Best regards

Crispin

 

From: Stoves [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Christina Espinosa
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:06 PM
To: Discussion of biomass cooking stoves
Subject: Re: [Stoves] Systematic cheating in car emissions and fuel efficiency 
tests

 

This is another great point Crispin. Maybe a fund needs to be created for an 
independent party to test and create the kind of report I mentioned in my 
earlier email. 

Best,

 

Christina


On Mar 14, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Josh Kearns <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

"In reality, some models emit 50% more CO2 than the official figures claim, 
while others emit some 15% more than claimed." .... 

 

Fascinating. 

An article linked in that piece also specified that several efficiency models, 
according to the manufacturers, "deliver between 70mpg and 75mpg, while the 
[independent] test figures ranged from 46mpg to 53mpg."

 

Do you think there is enough "real world" data on mileage and emissions to 
calculate a "correction factor" that could be applied to manufacturers' 
published claims? 

 

 

 

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott 
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Dear Stovers

 

This is interesting:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21759258

 

 

As the money gets bigger and there is more focus on these metrics, the 
temptation to cut corners, figuratively and literally, is strong.

 

The idea of independent validation of claims is sound.

 

Regards

Crispin

 


_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/







 

-- 
Josh Kearns
PhD Candidate, Environmental Engineering
University of Colorado-Boulder

Visiting Researcher, North Carolina State University

 

Director of Science

Aqueous Solutions 

www.aqsolutions.org <http://www.aqsolutions.org> 

 

Mobile: 720 989 3959
Skype: joshkearns




_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://www.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to