Dear Andrew, Julian and Paul, 

 Andrew, thanks for the compliment but wet process briquetting is no more my 
'bag' than it is the  thousands of others producing and training in production 
of briquettes  in 65 nations that we know of…. by now.  Lots has crossed the 
screen about briquettes over the pas week or so , so let me ramble on a bit my 
two cents, hopefully contributing something useful to  the main points; 

Char, ash or nothing-- as residue from combustion:
What we hear back and can confirm ourselves is that the briquette varies 
considerably in terms of performance viz., char-producing versus ash-producing 
versus nothing-producing depending upon ingredient and skill at blending and of 
course the combustion appliance itself. One can pretty much control char output 
from the hollow core briquette, as one would with wood.

Others say no charcoal is necessary in an agro-residue briquette for 
combustion; in fact they say that charcoal indeed retards combustion of some of 
the better  agro- residues blends I have seen combusted. That aside, charcoal 
may or may not be desired anyway, as it all depends upon what the cook is 
cooking!


Briquette size ..
The size can vary from 2.5" to 6" square to round octagonal hexagonal..and 
everything in between. Some have managed to create 4 to 6 wedges of ~ 1" on a 
side ( as viewed on the end face)  as Paul will attest  but I do not know the 
outcome of that effort. 

Adding charcoal to the center hole,
Like adding wood sticks tends to sustain an otherwise poorly or barely burning 
briquette, poor being determined by again, moisture content and/or blend and/or 
combustion appliance. The best bet is to super dry the briquette nest to the 
stove BEFOR putting it into the combustion chamber. Especially effective is you 
have aromatics which  you want driven off into the room without smoke…And once 
the aromatics are driven off, the briquette is now bone dry and pre heated (at 
around 150 degrees F maximum, you can usually still hold it though) , and the 
briquette ignites almost immediately,  with almost no smoke. Win Win. 

Sticks and charcoal can actually retard burning, if they block air flow thru 
the center hole too much.

Blending process;
It sounds simple but the bit about" the fibers separate then , mesh together" 
could contain a PhD dissertation.. On the ground, its right at this point that 
knowing how to make the fibers flexible but still with retained strength (at 
least in tension) and know how to bend in other residues, which will infill the 
matrix of such fibers --and how to create this blend on a continuous basis 
efficiently, that separates the hobbyist from the sincere producer..


Pressing issues;
Starting saturated volumes of such blends are typically reduced by a factor to 
two to three in a typical hand actuated press in a production setting. Typical 
working pressures in such presses are between 14 and 18 bars/kg/cc ( ~200  to ~ 
250 psi). But it's not so much the pressure that determines the quality and 
density of the final briquette but rather the quality of the attention to the 
kind of residues used, their blending and the infilling process. There are more 
than 25 generically different presses up on-line now but most will fall 
in-between the mentioned working pressure range- if they have been optimised to 
a sustained production operation in the various local market environments. 

More recently colleagues in Haiti, Hungary,  and Uganda have been developing 
multi-cylinder batch fed hydraulic jack actuated presses producing in excess of 
20 briquettes per minute (as co-venters in that process, we will be returning 
to Guatemala this fall with to work with various artisanas there in adapting 
selected design elements of these presses, as a practical Guatemalan version 
this fall.  With all that though, the pressing is only effective if the 
material selection processing and blending bits are gotten right in the first 
place…

Use of grass or other ag residue green versus non green. 
Our own experience and observations tell us that attempting to burn a green 
material, is fraught with difficulties. The compounds resulting from combustion 
are very likely carcinogenic but more importantly to the typical user, 
"smokey". We recommend processing, blending then burning pre browned material 
only. Some will make up the briquette with green--particularly--grass as such, 
are more temptingly enough,  pliable and sticky in that state. They will then  
wait for the compressed green briquette to naturally brown-out in the finished 
briquette. That takes a lot longer to happen than simple drying of a 
pre-browned briquette, but so be it. More sophisticated special air drying 
units have proven able to burn green grass with minimal smoke but that's not 
generally a technology that the rest of the 90% of us can access- much less use 
practically. 
 

Combustion, 
Rok Oblak dove into the adaptation of side-fed rocket stoves of the Approvecho 
sort, several years ago and he has managed to produce some fairly good results 
as you can see on his site. Josh Guinto has managed the same effect in the 
Philippines, as has Isaac Owor in Uganda. 
But  appropo of this group's ongong passion for perfection in nomenclature, a 
bit of clarification of terminology is needed when it comes to side fed stoves. 
 To say "top lit" is to bend the rules as it is lit from the outside horizontal 
feed end of the stove and is combusted from there into the center of the stove. 
"Side lit, interior-trending draft" is probably a bit closer to the mark .  

Kobus Venter and I managed to gassify top lit coal blend versions with a 
near-perfect gas stove burner-like output for several minutes, and as long as 
the wind was not blowing. But those were the  heady days in Paushoft.  Kobus 
has since taken it way beyond this point. 

These are just two of probably the hundreds of examples of good combustion that 
we have seen by now: We are nothing compared to the real scale of on-going 
production activities.     

As to cost,
The hollow core briquette product  is (at least as produced by the more 
successful self sustaining producers who are generally working in response to 
their respective local markets)   will typically sell for between 1.5 and 2.5% 
of one worker's daily wage  (it's relatively easy to assume this range, as the 
production cost –in the micro entreprenur level at least– is over 90% labor 
cost-dependent); Generally costs will fall between 2.5 and 6 US cents per each 
4" /10cm dia x 3"/ 7.5cm tall briquette. Cost increases generally with more 
charcoal content, built in aromatic qualities (for such as hotel ambience, 
religious ceremony, or health).  Their value goes up, if produced then sold 
during the rainy season (in like proportion to wood and charcoal).   
Generally, 2 ½  such briquettes (roughly 350 to 400 grams of briquetted biomass 
in total) is needed per person, per day in the typical rural pr urban poor 
household in the third world.  

Agh but how we need these things called words and numbers to describe it all 
and do we ever have a hey day with that, eh ?
 The simple fact is that most of the real masters of the craft have little 
knowledge of all these numbers and terminology. They rather, have this kind of 
"feel" and a sence for it. Their hands are moisture meters compression and 
density instruments far more fine tuned that our own tech dependent appendages  
And beyond that, this battery free "sense for it all" seems to quite naturally  
 resonate  with most other trainees who are similarly close to the land, 
despite near impossible language and cultural barriers .. A kind of (Rupert) 
Sheldrakian twist to our notion of science,  as it were..  


The fun part is discovering what you can learn from others you have 
taught…better still, to learn how to learn from them is the thing… 

Hasta badaye, 

 Richard Stanley
www.Legacyfound.org



On Apr 28, 2013, at 8:43 AM, [email protected] wrote:

[Default] On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 08:08:40 -0400,Julien Winter
<[email protected]> wrote:


> Of course, the preferred choice is to use pellets in stoves, but for
> some people, pellets could be a bit expensive.  Briquettes look like a
> good compromise between uncompressed crop residues and pellets, if
> they can be made using low-cost equipment that doesn't require
> electricity.
> 
> What is the experience of stove researchers with briquettes?  Do they
> burn cleanly and efficiency in TLUD stoves?   Are they a bit bulky for
> cookstoves?  Do they make biochar, or do they turn to ash as they burn
> in from the outside?

The briquetting is Richard's bag and I expect he will reply. To say
that pellets "could be a bit expensive" is an understatement for those
people that the Legacy Foundation teaches how to utilise crop residues
as a cooking fuel. Essentially the process is a bit like making
papiere mache from residues that has started to decompose, the fibres
separate and then mesh together in a simple wet press. Other wastes
like sawdust and charcoal fines can be entrained in the mesh of fibres
to bulk the briquette and often in crease the energy content. They
then dry in the sun.

Yes they do burn TLUD

http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/node/185

Have a search on Kobus Ventner and Rok Oblak at this site as they have
a wealth of experience making briquette burning stoves.

AJH

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/



_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to