Crispin. Cc list

   You say below re a perceived deficiency in TLUDS

      "Cooking absolutely requires power control. A pyrolysis zone is 
inherently set against such conditions. "

   There has been considerable reporting on this list of the TDR (turn down 
ratios) of TLUDs - and most have this capability.  Power control seems to be 
linearly related to primary air supply. often regarded as one of the major 
benefits of TLUDs

   What am I missing or not understanding in your "inherently" statement?

Ron



On Jun 10, 2013, at 10:02 AM, "Crispin Pemberton-Pigott" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Julien
>  
> I think it is important to emphasize that just because a TLUD burns really 
> cleanly, it is not necessary to use that method in order to a) burn just as 
> clean, b) to burn pellets, c) to make char if desired.
>  
> Despite the early raving about the high quality of TLUD emissions, this is 
> not always the case. TLUD are quite capable of produce high tar emissions 
> with poor combustion. Alternative designs like crossdraft and downdraft 
> stoves are quite capable of producing very low emissions. In all three 
> designs the critical factors are the same: heating of the fuel slowly to dry 
> it and create gases, a hot zone to break down the gases into mostly CO and H2 
> and water vapour, a hot combustion zone with limited excess air, a heat 
> exchange zone where the completed burn passes to the pot (etc).
>  
> TLUD's are one way to get that nice set of features, if they are built 
> correctly. Many are not, but are still better than an open fire or a dreadful 
> 'box with a chimney'.
>  
> I appreciate the enthusiasm for the TLUD as an easy solution but it brings a 
> number of problems many users do not want to face: producing or using small 
> fuel particles (strong resistance to fuel preparation in Indonesia) and the 
> (almost) inability to be refuelled for continuous operation (4 hour burns are 
> common).
>  
> TLUD's are also very fuel dependent in terms of size, moisture, species and 
> the minimum power level to work properly. It is not a technology that solves 
> all our problems. Notice that Paul A and Paul are both very clear about how 
> to get wood or rice hulls or other fuels to 'burn properly' and that does not 
> make the fire controllable, it just makes it clean. Cooking absolutely 
> requires power control. A pyrolysis zone is inherently set against such 
> conditions. That is why TLUD coal stoves make such great space heating 
> appliances: continuous heat at constant power with at least some measure of 
> controllability. But they only cook at high power, basically.
>  
> Regards
> Crispin
>  
> +++++++
>  
> Dear Crispin;
>  
> Thanks for your excellent response to the issue of untrafine particles and 
> the article by Just, Rogak and Kandlikar (2013).  That TLUDs have a strong 
> secondary gas fire is a very important distinction from many
> other stove designs.   The ability of a stove to handle a variety of
> fuel qualities is also an issue, because, as we all know, the rate of heat 
> production and the temperature of the flaming pyrolysis affects the nature 
> and temperature of gases entering the secondary gas fire.
> We may find that in area of high human population density, pellet fuels are 
> way-and-above the best option for low-emissions of particulate matter.  
> Hopefully, there can be a market for biochar to offset the cost of pellets.  
> That were soil scientists (me) come in.
>  
> Speaking of pollution being relative, my parents lived in London, England 
> during 1930-1950.  A lot of coal was burned for heating and cooking.  The 
> particle emissions produced nuclei for water vapor to condense resulting in 
> the infamous London fog.  It was at times so dense that bus conductors had to 
> get off the bus and walk in front to show drivers the way.  The people of 
> London simply assumed that it was normal that your window curtains and the 
> white marble of buildings turned back.  When Londoners switched to using more 
> gas and electricity, the famous fog went away.
>  
> Julien.
>  
> --
> Julien Winter
> Cobourg, ON, CANADA
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
> 
_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to