Richard cc List and Dan 

Thanks for the "Not" version below. This makes more sense in terms of your 
following sentences. I would be surprised if the mix I worked with was optimum. 
But hand-forming pressure came came out better than I expected. 

I did listen to all the videos you mentioned and that I could find on making 
smallish briquettes suitable for TLUDs. Nothing I saw compared to the success I 
think being seen for the "holey briquette" (a very nice shape and szie) I will 
next send a separate note on the charcoal-making potential of that). 

So, I would still appreciate hearing of any experiences by anyone on making 
smaller units (a size in between pellets and the holey briquette) - either with 
machines or by hand. Since my first message on hand-making, I now suggest the 
name of "thumbettes" - as they are the size and shape of that portion of ones' 
right hand thumb grasped in a left clenched fist (or vice versa). 

I think thumbettes (its making described in last message - a first squeeze in 
left hand, followed by only one squeeze in the right - done simultaneously). 
could be the fastest, cheapest way of making a small sufficiently-dense 
briquette-like fuel for TLUDs. I would rather it turn out more spherical, but I 
think this size/shape will work well enough. I hope others with a good mix will 
both try a two-hand/two-squeeze approach and suggest a better (faster, cheaper, 
etc) way to make a slurry-fed fuel that will densely pack for TLUds. 

Richard (anyone) - any other "thumbette" or "spherette" ideas from your 
experience? Again - thanks for the correction. 

Ron 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Stanley" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Cc: "Discussion of biomass" <[email protected]>, "daniel roggema" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:16:22 AM 
Subject: Re: Hand-makng small roundish briquettes: 

Ron, daniel et al. 
Apologies for my atrocious spelling. 
Here is what I was trying to say: 



Ron, 

Often greater squeezing pressure (to achieve greater density) is NOT the 
solution. It is most often about blending the right amount of fibrus material 
and combustible infiller. Its about attaining the right combination of fibers 
that are conditioned to flex plastically with an infilling material that is 
dense yet relatively porous. No amount of force will create a good briquette 
using the wet process becsue increased pressure results in shearing of the 
fibers and vaporising the water in the slurry, creating a crude form of steam 
cannon. 

I do not know what blend Approvecho uses as we lost contact with them after 
they visited here to gather what we were doing, but I would say that it is very 
likely that if you found paper blends there. Relatively dense briquettes can be 
achieved with paper-based blends by hand but paper is far from the ideal in 
terms of good hot combustion… 


<blockquote>

</blockquote>

Thanks for your patience, 


Richard Stanley 
===== 






_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to