The principle involved is that of putting a good combustor into a supporting frame.
Viewed dispassionately, most stovers build combustors and place a pot on top. Lots of people do not think of that as a 'stove'. Paul Anderson has been pretty upfront about saying that is what he often avoids. There is a stove and there is a burner in it. In order to test for safety I want to see a tilt test used where the large diameter pots sitting on three tiny supports will fall off (= fail). Regards Crispin Quoting Richard Stanley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >: Not sweating really but glad to know it was you talking... We see the same issues happen with the rocket stove of Roks as well as (mentioned) that of Joshua Guinto. Seems all to obvious a solution eh ? Hey, how about three stones ! for a support: Viz; introducing the supa three stone fire. Richard
_______________________________________________ Stoves mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
