12-15 m high ??? Cheers
Sarbagya On 20/09/2013, at 4:35 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote: > Very good paper with some novel adaptions of the test methods, approaches to > the community and the retrofitted device. > > The money photo is this one: > > <image003.jpg> > > The pot rests are far too tall and create several simultaneous problems for > effective heat transfer. The addition of turbulators is one way to address > some of this error. > > Given the reported power level the pot rests should be about 12-15m high and > that would reduce the initial problem. It would be interesting to see a stove > built with both changes. > > Regards > Crispin > > > +++++++++++ > List: > > 1, I recommend this recent new (free) technical stove paper: > > http://www.energsustainsoc.com/content/pdf/2192-0567-3-16.pdf > _______________________________________________ > Stoves mailing list > > to Send a Message to the list, use the email address > [email protected] > > to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page > http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org > > for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: > http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Stoves mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org for more Biomass Cooking Stoves, News and Information see our web site: http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/
