Dear Lanny

 

It is not really the latent of evaporation that is relevant (though the number 
is the same). It is the latent heat of condensation that is generally agreed is 
not realisable as useful energy for cooking purposes.

 

There is a 60 kJ error in it conceptually, however. It does not include as 
unrealisable the energy released by cooling the condensed water to 20 C. That 
is why Baldwin and I agree it (the estimated deduction from HHV if the H2 
content is not known) should be 1.38 not 1.32 but, who’s listening?

 

It is an bit arbitrary and that is what is used.  

 

Regards

Crispin

 

 

If the reaction takes place in a gaseous state, why does the laden heat of 
evaporation apply?

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to