Crispin and list

   1.  Since we are a few days away from the ETHOS meeting, and there will be 
some funders there, I hope you can elaborate on this phrase from below:

>    “….  the major pathologies have been excised …”
   
   2.  We have discoursed on your not measuring char production in the proposed 
test procedures for Indonesia.  Is char-production still a “pathology” that you 
have “excised", or do you now measure char production when testing stoves 
designed to intentionally make char?  

   3.  My question includes all possible “major pathologies”, not just 
char-production (my meme).  Just hoping for a list we should be considering at 
ETHOS.

Ron




On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Samer
>  
> It is my hope that Cecil Cook will wander through here one day because we 
> spent a great deal of time looking into these problems
>  
> >In particular I will be keen to explore more deeply the ramifications for 
> >testing, actual fuel use, and the memes that relate these to problems of 
> >deforestation and health.
>  
> By that I mean the problems related to the use of information generated by 
> the specialists who do not individually have much administrative control over 
> project design and management (in a lot of cases – there are exceptions).
>  
> I recall some years ago at ETHOS expressing a view that we really needed more 
> input from professional marketing people – input to the stove designers, 
> backyard inventors and hardly-ever-do-wells who are trying to make the world 
> a better place with what little they have.
>  
> The value of this input is to separate developers of technology from their 
> egos. No kidding. It is very disciplining to have in-your-face feedback about 
> one’s preconceptions for a product. Marketing people have enough power in the 
> relationship to make the message stick. If the speaker is an individual 
> objecting to a stove product, they (although the customer) are often 
> dismissed as not realising what a wonderful device I have created for you if 
> you would just learn to use it properly it will do wonderful things and make 
> your life better and your whole family will celebrate.
>  
> The next cold shower that brings benefit is professional traders who are the 
> middlemen in the value chain. Sometimes we can stimulate their enthusiasm 
> with storied stoves with creative claims attached, piggy-backing on their 
> existing distribution systems and sneak a ‘better product’ into their display 
> of wares.  Let’s say you can always do that once, but it had better work for 
> them. They are pretty callous about viability and their depth of view is 
> often not what is needed to launch a transformative stove product. They can 
> make a living selling other things too so the product has to be viable, 
> income-wise.
>  
> Another group that has had sterling success in attaching themselves to the 
> wonderful world of stoves (Disney Kitchen?) is the health community with 
> their agenda(s). The clear link between cooking and health is easily shown in 
> any community and the health sector has been a major proponent of improved, 
> especially lower-smoke stoves.
>  
> So these groups all have the capability to generate messages, and to receive 
> and store them.  They can create, store, modify, refute and extrapolate memes 
> arising from ‘things they heard’ about stoves.
>  
> The significant parallel I see in these collections of memes about what 
> stoves do, can do, should do and really do and the significant paper you and 
> Saeed have produced is that the complex world of stoves needs this sort of 
> analysis in order to avoid falling into a variety of traps. These traps are 
> the (often quite separate) agendas of a huge number of power centres always 
> on the lookout for the Next Big Thing they can manage, prosper from, ride, 
> lead, and ultimately benefit the generality of humankind through their good 
> efforts.
>  
> I have drawn attention to external forces and interests, but there is, were 
> one doing the same type of analysis as you have done, an internal group of 
> forces or interests that produce their own memes and circulate and evolve 
> them entirely within the stove community. One easy example is that ‘gasifiers 
> are inherently cleaner burning than other combustors’.  In fact all fires are 
> gas fires. Teasing out the intended meaning from these words gets one into a 
> repetitive semantic discussion that doesn’t really mean much except to the 
> participants. The meme continues, sailing along on the current of 
> misunderstanding that there might be ‘other fires’ that do not burn gases and 
> that those ‘other fires’ are inherently ‘dirtier’ that gasifier fires. 
> Consider the remarkable examples (with hundreds of thousands of citations) of 
> fuels themselves being given the attributes of ‘clean’ and ‘dirty’!
>  
> These curiosities are fun and harmless unless they start to impact policy and 
> that policy impact is driven by a power centre that lies outside the 
> influence of the stove making community that create the meme in the first 
> place. That power centre is now ‘misinformed’ and begins allocating the 
> distribution of resources based on their understanding.
>  
> The result, in short, is that the projects which create, disseminate and 
> promote improved stoves (however defined) and fuels (ditto) can be quite 
> severely skewed towards goals that may actually be ephemeral. An alternative 
> is that the goals are real, but low priority in the community of interest.
>  
> So, what to do about it. That is where Cecil Cook and Tig Tuntivate, Veronica 
> Mendizabal, Helen Carlsson, Simon Bell, Iwan Boskoro, Prianti Utami, 
> Christina Aristanti, Yabei Zhang plus too many others to mention come in. 
> Taking a comprehensive view of what happens in the community (behaviour and 
> resources), the market as it really exists, finance models that avoid as many 
> pitfalls as possible, producers and distributors who are or want to be in the 
> formal sector a new approach to the construction of a stove programme has 
> been taken and is being piloted in Indonesia.
>  
> This approach includes significant changes in the way resources are allocated 
> to those who ‘cause better stoves to be purchased’ (which is the ultimate 
> goal of a viable stove industry). It includes upgrading the level of input to 
> the point of power sharing from social scientists (social anthropologists and 
> sociologists, social workers etc). It includes developing new and affordable 
> test methods for making comparative evaluations that allow meaningfully 
> accurate lab tests to realistically predict performance when the stoves are 
> used in a target community. It includes careful programme design so that the 
> system is scalable to Really Big if the spend is justifiable.
>  
> If you, Samer, were to study this initiative from the outside I think you 
> would find the sort of critique you present in the paper has been done on 
> multiple levels by this team, and as far as we were able in the time 
> allocated, the major pathologies have been excised and hopeful innovations 
> substituted. My hope is that they are well-considered!
>  
> I will provide more details related to the technical side of the project when 
> it is appropriate.
>  
> Regards
> Crispin freezing (again) in Waterloo
>  
> Technologizing Humanitarian Space: Darfur Advocacy and the Rape-Stove Panacea 
>  Samer Abdelnour and Akbar M. Saeed
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259104849_Technologizing_Humanitarian_Space_Darfur_Advocacy_and_the_Rape-Stove_Panacea/file/5046352d950ca6cfdf.pdf?ev=pub_int_doc_dl&origin=publication_detail&inViewer=true
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Stoves mailing list
> 
> to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
> [email protected]
> 
> to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
> http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org
> 
> for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
> http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list

to Send a Message to the list, use the email address
[email protected]

to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page
http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_lists.bioenergylists.org

for more Biomass Cooking Stoves,  News and Information see our web site:
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org/

Reply via email to