Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________
 
 

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send Stpaul mailing list submissions to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
>       http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Stpaul digest..."
> 
> 
> St. Paul E-Democracy Links
> http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/links.html
> _____________________________________________
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Re: [GPM] Stopping Home Depot (PAUL
> CASSIDY)
>    2. Re: Re: [GPM] Stopping Home Depot (Pamela Joy
> Ellison)
>    3. Re: SPPS: Area Superintendent Job Description
> (John Birrenbach)
>    4. SPPS: Area Superintendent Job costs (Thomas
> Swift)
>    5. Re: SPPS: Area Superintendent Job Description
> (Tim Erickson)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:17:43 -0600
> From: "PAUL CASSIDY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [StPaul] Re: [GPM] Stopping Home Depot
> To: "David Strand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,       "Dan Dobson"
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Pamela Joy Ellison"
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Dan Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Thune
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       Donna Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,      St
> Paul Forum
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,    Jay Benanav
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  Pat
>       Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,     Jane Prince
>       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;     charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Pam & Dan win...David is wrong.   I am sure HD does
> not have a corporate mission statement (web site is
> pretty clear-"everyone has value, regardles of
> gender, ethnic or educational background")that says
> they support or oppose sexual orientation.  They
> simply do what every good company should do-support
> their employees, regardless of who they are or what
> they believe.  Hiring practices, benefits, etc. HD
> walks the talk.  So why would we turn them away?  Go
> over to the HD in the Quarry  in Mpls and take a
> look at the diversity of the employees, managers and
> customers (remember Knox?...never again) and the
> development that it has fostered in that area of
> Northeast.
> 
> Paul-St. Paul
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Pamela Joy
> Ellison<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>   To: David Strand<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Dan
> Dobson<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ;
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>   Cc: Pat Harris<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ; Dave Thune<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Donna
> Swanson<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; St
> Paul Forum<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Jay
> Benanav<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Dan
> Dobson<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Jane
> Prince<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>   Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:45 AM
>   Subject: Re: [StPaul] Re: [GPM] Stopping Home
> Depot
> 
> 
>   Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
>  
>
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html<http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html>
>   _________________________________________
>    
>    
>   I thought it was stated somewhere that local mom
> and pop hardware stores and
>   activists that supported them stopped the store,
> so which is the accurate
>   account of what really happened?
> 
>   Anyone have any other insights?  I know of gay
> friends that work for Home
>   Depot and love it, and appreciate the benefits
> package, so the account from
>   David Strand doesn't resonate with what I know,
> but I could be very wrong on
>   this.
> 
>   Can anyone else shed any light on this topic?
> 
>   Pamela Ellison
>   Como Park
>   Saint Paul
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "David Strand"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>   To: "Dan Dobson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>   Cc: "Dan Dobson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
> "Dave Thune"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
>   "Donna Swanson"
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
> "St Paul Forum"
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
> "Jay Benanav"
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
> "Pat
>   Harris"
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>;
> "Jane Prince"
>  
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>   Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:30 PM
>   Subject: [StPaul] Re: [GPM] Stopping Home Depot
> 
> 
>   > Please Introduce Yourself
>   > What's your connection to St. Paul public
> schools?
>   >
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   > _________________________________________
>   >
>   >
>   > Actually Dan, We spoke with the city
> councilperson
>   > representing the ward where the Home Depot was
> looking
>   > to build and pointed out that city policy in St.
> Paul
>   > required that companies recieving business from
> the
>   > city provide for nondiscrimination on the basis
> of
>   > race, sex, sexual orientation, etc.
>   >
>   > At the time, Home Depot was subject of a
> national
>   > campaign to get the company to add sexual
> orientation
>   > to their nondiscrimination policy.  Both current
> and
>   > former employees alleged that their was a
> definite
>   > need to address such discrimination within the
>   > company.  Blakey staff stated that they would
> bring
>   > this argument against the development forward
> among
>   > other reasons to oppose the project.  Other city
>   > council people were called about this issue.
>   >
>   > I did not say that the nondiscrimination issue
> was
>   > decisive.  It did however play a role.
>   >
>   > Having a city ordinance that required that any
>   > companies recieving city business or subsidy of
> any
>   > notable size needed to provide domestic
> partnership
>   > benefits would disqualify Walmart from recieving
> such
>   > subsidy as Walmart does not offer domestic
> partnership
>   > benefits as Target, and many other retailers do.
>   >
>   > I am not saying this would be the reason such a
>   > project would be stopped cold as the company
> could
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to