Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________
 
 
If CVS needs to attract a much greater volume of business than the
local area can provde, its in the wrong location.
 
I certainly will not drive to a freeway and then the 7 miles to
lexington to shop at CVS.  I am pretty certain I will not think on
one of my trips down 94 that I need to buy something from a drug
store, I better take the Lexington exit and go to CVS.
 
I live a mile and a half from three Wallgreens and one Snyder
Brothers Drug stores.  What does CVS have to offer that would change
my buyin habits
 
Mike Fratto
Payne Phalen

>>> Jeanne Weigum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/24/2004 12:15:37 PM >>>

Index of SPPS Budget Discussion
http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/spps-posts.html
_________________________________________


Last night about 30 community members attended another meeting to
discuss the proposed CVS store at University and Snelling.  A
member of
the CVS design team (Velmier), someone from PED and Jane Prince
from
Jay's office were also present.  The issue was this.  University
United
filed an appeal of the Planning Commission ruling which allowed
the
project to move forward.  UU believes that this is a very
significant
corner and the building should be significant (not a one-story
chunk cut
from the middle of a suburban strip mall) and should be transit
friendly.  The proposed CVS store is absolutely not transit
friendly (no
door on University Avenue, only door from the back parking lot) and
is
nothing like the traditional architecture of University Ave..  CVS
has
proposed come cosmetic alterations and UU wanted to meet with the
community to determine if the community continued to support the
appeal
or believed that CVS had come far enough.

Virtually all of the citizens who attended the meeting spoke in
favor of
continuing the appeal.  They expressed strong support for transit
friendly development and continuing to insist that this be a
building
that we can be proud of, not one we have to turn our eyes away from
and
wonder how it dropped in here from I-94 and Radio Drive.

Probably the most interesting interaction of the evening came when
one
of the citizens asked who this store intends to attract as
customers.
He point was that if CVS wanted to attract the neighborhood, this
type
of store simply missed the point.  If, on the other hand, CVS
wanted to
primarily attract the people who drive by on their way to the
burbs,
then this might be a good choice.  The Velmier guy said something
like,
'That is a fair question.  This store needs to do much more volume
than
could ever be supplied by the neighborhood. We really do need to
draw
from a much wider area.'

That pretty much answered the question.

The neighborhood types all spoke in favor of continuing the appeal.
 It
will be up to the UU board to make the final decision, but there
was
certainly no support for throwing in the towel just now.

--
Jeanne Weigum
651-646-3005
fax 651-646-0142



_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

_____________________________________________
SPPS Budget Reduction Forum - Feb. 23-27
Co-Sponsored By NEAT: http://www.stpaulneat.org/
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to