--------------------------------------------------
Last Chance to Offer Input On New Chief of Police!

May 3rd at Harding High * May 4th at Humboldt High
Info: http://www.e-democracy.org/stpaul/chief.html
--------------------------------------------------
 
 
In a message dated 5/3/2004 12:50:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

> However, it is unlikely the Board will accept the  mayor's claim that the city 
> council can accept gifts via a city council vote.  I smashed that argument pretty 
> solid. 

Is it your contention then that under the current law no one can donate anything to 
the City of Saint Paul?  Since the gift ban clearly covers not only elected officials 
but city employees also, and any donation in some way assists the City in doing its 
work, and under your contention the City Council can't accept a donation to allow the 
elected officials to do their work, than the Council can't accept donations for any 
city employee to do their work, correct?  

The City for years has passed resolutions accepting donations from corporations of 
equipment or cash.  Bright staff people solicit those donations and the company gets 
good PR and a tax write off.  It would not be unusual for a company to make a 
restricted cash donation for example to send an undesignated city employee to a 
training on a topic that concerned their issue (public safety, equal rights, fire 
safety).  

So, when Marty laws went into effect the Council has done the same thing for donations 
to encourage the participation of elected officials in civic events that cost money.  
Promoting the City of Saint Paul is a part of the job of the mayor and council.  As 
such, when the mayor or council goes to a hockey game to visibly promote the city as a 
part of their job duties the city will pay for the ticket.  If the law does not allow 
the acceptance of those tickets (to do the business of the city) then we'd have to 
assume that the law does not allow any business to donate anything to the City.  

I had thought, and could be wrong, that the law was intended to make sure that 
businesses or interested parties did not make personal gifts to elected officials.  
Those who assume that tickets are personal donations assume that the elected official 
wants to give up another night with the family to be out doing PR.  Folks, I know you 
don't believe me, but its a part of the job, and as a part of the job the game face is 
on and the man (or woman) is working.  

During the eight years when I worked for a city council member whenever I would go out 
with my better half, she'd ask me, "are WE going out tonight, or are you working and 
I'm just with you?"  There was a difference.

Anyway, you may be right, the law may prohibit the City from ever taking anything from 
anyone for any purpose.  If true its a shame.

Just My Opinion Not Those Of My Employers Past Present Or Future

Chuck Repke
_____________________________________________
NEW ADDRESS FOR LIST:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
To subscribe, modify subscription, or get your password - visit:
http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/stpaul

Archive Address:
   http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/private/stpaul/

Reply via email to